[…] 7. In compliance with its obligation to remove all de facto and de jure obstacles that maintain impunity regarding the torture and inhuman treatment suffered by José Luis Ibsen Peña, the State must open the necessary investigations to determine, within a reasonable time, all the corresponding responsibilities for his deprivation of liberty and subsequent disappearance, in the terms of paragraphs 237 to 238 of th[e] Judgment[;] 8. In compliance with its obligation to remove all de facto and de jure obstacles that maintain impunity regarding the forced disappearance and murder of Rainer Ibsen Cárdenas, the State must open all necessary investigations to determine what happened and to apply the corresponding punishments and consequences, within a reasonable time, in the terms of paragraphs 237 to 238 of th[e] Judgment[;] 9. The State must continue the search for the whereabouts of José Luis Ibsen Peña, in the terms of paragraph 242 of th[e] Judgment[;] 10. The State must publish, once, in the Official Gazette, paragraphs 1 to 5, 23 to 29, 33, 34, 36 to 38, 50 to 57, 67, 68, 71 to 75, 80 to 82, 84 to 92, 94, 102 to 111, 115, 116, 118, 119, 122, 126, 128 to 133, 155 to 163, 165 to 174, 177, 178, 180 to 184, 189 to 191, 193 to 195, 197 to 202, 205 to 212, 214 to 226, 231 and 232 of th[e] Judgment, including the names of each chapter and the corresponding section, without the footnotes, and its operative paragraphs; publish the official summary of th[e] Judgment in a national newspaper with widespread circulation, and publish the complete Judgment on an appropriate website, in the terms of paragraph 244 [t]hereof[;] 11. The State must reach agreement with the next of kin of Rainer Ibsen Cárdenas and José Luis Ibsen Peña on the designation of a public place with their names, where a plaque shall be placed on which th[e] Judgment, the facts of the case and the circumstances in which they occurred are mentioned, in the terms of paragraph 249 of th[e] Judgment[;] 12. The State must provide free medical and psychological or psychiatric care, immediately, appropriately and effectively, through its specialized public health institutions, to the persons who have been declared victims in th[e] Judgment that request this, in the terms of paragraphs 253 and 254 [t]hereof[;] 13. The State must implement, within a reasonable time and with the corresponding budgetary resources, a training program on the proper investigation and prosecution of acts that constitute forced disappearance of persons for officials of the Public Prosecution Service and judges of the Bolivian Judiciary with jurisdiction for the investigation and prosecution of facts such as those that occurred in the instant case, to ensure that the said officials have the necessary legal, technical and scientific elements to assess the practice of forced disappearance integrally, in the terms of paragraphs 257 to 259 of th[e] Judgment, and 14. The State must pay the amounts established in paragraphs 267, 271, 276, 283 and 291 of th[e] Judgment, as compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and reimbursement of costs and expenses, as appropriate, within one year of notification of th[e] Judgment, in the terms of paragraphs 266, 270, 274, 275, 282 and 288 to 290 [t]hereof. […] 2. The briefs of September 2, November 18 and 23, and December 13, 2010; January 10 and 12, March 10, April 28, July 26, October 7 and November 18, 2011; January 18 and August 21, 2012, and February 14 and 25, 2013, in which the State forwarded information on compliance with the Judgment (supra having seen paragraph 1). 3. The briefs of January 17, February 18, June 17, September 14 and November 14, 2011, February 2, 7 and 16, September 28, November 8 and December 10, 2012, and March 13, 2013, in which the representatives of the victims (hereinafter “the representatives”) forwarded observations on the information provided by the State (supra having seen paragraph 2). Also, the briefs of August 11, and October 12 and 20, 2011, and of February 4 and 16, 2013, in which the representatives submitted information on the State’s compliance with the Judgment. In the briefs of February 16 and March 13, 2013, the representatives requested a hearing on monitoring compliance with the Judgment handed down in this case. 2