7 18. That the representatives indicated that an association had been set up with the participation of members of the village of Plan de Sánchez and other beneficiaries. However, since certain administrative procedures have yet to be completed in connection with the formal organization of said association, an account still remains to be opened in the name of the entity so that the money can be deposited into it. They added that the State had advised them that the funds were already available. Then, they stated that “[…] the procedure for the registration of [the] Association had finally been completed and the relevant account opened […]” and that they were awaiting notice from the State regarding the date on which the relevant amount is to be actually paid into it (supra Having Seen clause No. 4). 19. That the Commission welcomed the favorable disposition of the State to comply with its obligations under this operative paragraph. It further explained that it was awaiting resolution of the existing obstacles, as the State already had the funds required to be paid for infrastructure maintenance and improvements at the Plan de Sánchez chapel (supra Having Seen clause No. 5). 20. That, based on the information provided by the parties, even though the State is willing to pay the relevant sum for infrastructure maintenance and improvements at the memorial chapel, to the date of this Order there is no up-to-date information on the status of compliance with this operative paragraph. Moreover, considering the statements of the representatives, the Court finds it necessary for them to provide the State with the relevant information (name and bank account number for the deposit, etc.), so as to speed up the relevant steps. Lastly, the Court reiterates its statements in item (d) of the third declarative paragraph of its Order of November 28, 2007, (supra Having Seen No. 2), and considers it essential that both the State and the representatives report back to it on the steps taken in order to comply with the sixth operative paragraph of the Judgment, so that compliance status may then be assessed. * * * 21. That, as regards to, the tenth, eleventh, twelfth, thirteenth, fourteenth and fifteenth operative paragraphs of the Judgment (supra Having Seen clause No. 1), which deal with the amounts to be paid on account of pecuniary damage, non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses, the State advised, that on January 11, 2008, it had paid the third and final installment of the full amount set in said Judgment. Moreover, the State provided 268 payment release documents evidencing payment to most of the victims of the third installment of the full amount awarded in the Judgment plus interest accrued as of such date. It also provided a release document for payment of the third installment on account of costs and expenses to the representatives (supra Having Seen clause No. 3). 22. That this Court finds it appropriate next to make reference to the situation of certain victims or their next of kin regarding actual payment of the compensation awarded in the Judgment. In this regard, it should be noted as to the failure to submit the copies of the release documents for payment of the second installment to Rosario Galeano, Juan Galeano, Albino Cajbón, Hilario Galeano, Catalina Galeano, and Silvestre Galeano, which this Court had asked for in the Order of November 28, 2007, that the State explained that, upon examining the information provided by Silvestre and Hilario Galeano, it had verified that such persons were indeed the ones referred to in the Judgment on Reparations and, therefore, on January 11, 2008 they were paid the full