6 iv) it only remains that the State pay the compensation of US$ 25,000.00 to Marcos Ramírez Álvarez. Since he has reached the age of majority it is no longer necessary to set up a trust in his name. e) regarding the obligation to pay within one year, the amount determined in the Judgment for the costs and expenses accrued in the domestic and international proceedings before the inter-American system of protection of human rights, that: i) in February 2006, the State paid Mr. Wilson García Asto the amount ordered by the Court for costs and expenses and therefore the State has complied with this part of the Judgment, and ii) Mr. Ramírez Rojas has been paid this portion of the Judgment along with his compensation for material and immaterial damage, with the exception of US$7,400.00. f) regarding the obligation to publish in the Official Gazette and in other newspapers of nation-wide circulation, the relevant parts of the Judgment, that: i) the State published the relevant parts of the Judgment in the Official Gazette, however, the publication in a newspaper of nation-wide circulation is still pending, and ii) the representatives ask the Court to instruct the State that before publishing the parts of the Court’s Judgments in a newspaper of nationwide circulation, the State inform Mr. García Asto and Mr. Ramírez Rojas of the date it will be published so that the reparation measure can fulfill its intended purpose. g) regarding the new criminal proceedings against Mr. Urcesino Ramírez Rojas, that: i) although the Judgment of the Court did not expressly order the termination of all violations, it tacitly includes the State’s obligation to cease all acts that generated the violations in the second trial against Mr. Ramírez Rojas, in particular of Articles 7(3) and 8(1) of the Convention; ii) this aspect is part of the monitoring of compliance since, as stated in paragraphs 173 and 175 of the Judgment, “the Court extended the effects of its power to monitor the compliance of the Judgment to the verification of compliance by the State of due process of law, with all guarantees and defenses, in favor of Mr. Urcesino Ramírez Rojas”; iii) on January 24, 2006 the National Terrorism Chamber (“Sala Nacional de Terrorismo”) decided to grant Mr. Ramírez Rojas provisional freedom effective as of January 26, 2006; iv) on May 2, 2006 the Judgment was handed down by the National Criminal Chamber of Terrorism (“Sala Penal Nacional de Terrorismo”) during a public judicial proceeding. Said Judgment violates and challenges that which was resolved in not only the operative paragraphs, but also in the Considerings of the Court’s Judgment;