49 dollars) to Pelagia Mélida Contreras de Cantoral, who will deliver the corresponding amount to the representatives. The State shall make the payment for costs and expenses within one year of notification of this Judgment. F) Means of compliance with the payments ordered 206. If, for reasons attributable to the beneficiaries of the compensation, it is not possible for them to receive it within the period indicated in the preceding paragraph, the State shall deposit the amounts in their favor in an account or a deposit certificate in a solvent Peruvian banking institute in United States dollars and in the most favorable financial conditions permitted by law and banking practice. If, after 10 years, the compensation has not been claimed, it shall revert to the State with the accrued interest. 207. The State may comply with its pecuniary obligations by payment in United Sates dollars or the equivalent amount in Peruvian currency, using the exchange rate between the two currencies in force on the market in New York, United States of America, the day before the payment to make the respective calculation. 208. The amounts allocated in this Judgment for compensation and for reimbursement of costs and expenses may not be affected or conditioned by current or future taxes or charges. To that end, they must be delivered to the beneficiaries integrally, as established in the judgment. 209. If the State falls into arrears, it shall pay interest on the amount owed, corresponding to banking interest on arrears in Peru. 210. In accordance with its consistent practice, the Court reserves the right inherent in its attributes, and derived from Article 65 of the American Convention, to monitor compliance with all the terms of this Judgment. The case will be closed when the State has fully complied with all its terms. Within one year of notification of the Judgment, Peru shall provide the Court with a report on the measures adopted to comply with the judgment. XII OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS Therefore, THE COURT 1. Accepts the partial acknowledgement of responsibility made by the State, in the terms of paragraphs 34 to 37 of this judgment. DECLARES, unanimously that: 2. The State violated the right to life embodied in Article 4 of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to the obligation to respect and ensure those rights established in Article 1(1) thereof, to the detriment of Saúl Cantoral-Huamaní and Consuelo GarcíaSanta Cruz, in the terms of paragraphs 79 to 106 of this Judgment.