3 5. The Order on the monitoring of compliance with the Judgment issued by the President of the Court on December 18, 2009, in which the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Commission” or “the Commission”), the representatives of the victims (hereinafter “the representatives”), and the State were summoned to a private hearing at the seat of the Court on February 1, 2010, so that the latter could obtain complete and updated information from the State on its compliance with the Judgment, as well as observations from the Commission and the representatives. 6. The communication of January 20, 2010, whereby the representatives indicated that they would be unable to attend the hearing scheduled by the Court and requested that they be allowed to submit their views on the State’s compliance with the Judgment in writing. Through the Secretariat’s note of January 25, 2010, the representatives were informed that they had until January 28, 2010, to file their submissions. 7. The brief dated January 28, 2010, whereby the representatives submitted information on the State’s compliance with the Judgment (supra Having Seen clause 6). 8. The private hearing held at the seat of the Court on February 1, 2010. 1 9. The Secretariat’s note of February 8, 2010, which specified the information that the parties were required to include in the written report requested by the Court at the end of the private hearing (supra Having Seen clause 8). 10. The brief dated February 28, 2010, whereby the representatives submitted their comments on the private hearing and on the documents submitted by the State during the hearing (supra Having Seen clause 8). 11. The communication of March 2, 2010, whereby the State submitted the written report requested by the Court at the end of the private hearing (supra Having Seen clause 8). 12. The Secretariat’s notes of March 8, May 7, and September 30, 2010, which indicated that in its report (supra Having Seen clause 11), the State did not include the schedule requested in the Secretariat's note of February 8, 2010 (supra Having Seen clause 9), for the transfer of the amounts still owed to the development fund 1 The following persons appeared at the hearing: a) on behalf of the Inter-American Commission, Karla Quintana and Silvia Serrano, Attorneys of the Executive Secretariat; and b) on behalf of the State, Margo Waterval, Head of the Delegation; Loes Monsels, M.Sc, Chair of the Commission on the Implementation of the Moiwana Judgment; Jornell Vinkwolk, LL.M., Head of the Human Rights Bureau; Patricia Meulenhof, LL.M, Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Regional Development; and Monique Pool, Translator. As indicated in their communication of January 20, 2010, the representatives were not present at the private hearing (supra Having Seen clause 6).