5 held discussions with representatives of COPREDEH in order to expedite the necessary procedures to comply with the agreements that are still pending; c) sought to set and coordinate a date to hold a meeting with the SAAS in order to get protection for Fredy Peccerelli’s children [Tristán Collin and Ashley Corienne Peccerelli-Valle], and d) sought to arrange meetings with the Ministry of the Interior and the Attorney General’s Office in order to urge coordination between both institutions in relation to the investigation into the facts of the case. In addition, as regards the alleged threats, the representatives referred to “[t]he great responsibility of the State given that, despite having knowledge of the continuous threats to which members of [the FAFG and some relatives] have been subjected [...], so far, the Attorney General’s Office has not provided any indication that a serious, effective, impartial and efficient investigation is underway” and that “[e]ven though there are legal procedures that must be exhausted, it is also true that the last threats have been made via email[; therefore,] the State should [...] provide an immediate response and try to locate the source of [these messages], without any excuse.” The representatives reiterated the need for the Attorney General’s Office to take urgent action regarding the determination of those responsible for these incidents and for the State to enhance the protection that has provided so far. 14. That the State informed the Court that, on May 31, 2007, met with Mr. Fredy PeccerelliMonterroso, at which meeting the Minister of the Interior took on new commitments (supra Considering clause No. 6). Furthermore, the State pointed out that, on August 13, 2008, the Prosecutors for Human Rights Activists of the Attorney General’s Office met with Mr. José Suasnávar, Deputy Director of the FAFG and informed him that the reported incidents are being investigated by the Division of Analysis of Attacks against Human Rights Activists. As regards the alleged threats received on Mr. Peccerelli’s cell phone (supra Considering clause No. 12), they informed him that they requested the telephone company to provide the relevant telephone records in order to determine the source of the calls, but that it was “impossible to establish the identify of the person or persons who purchased the prepaid cell phones.” 15. That, as regards the commitments undertaken by the State (supra Considering clause No. 6), the representatives stated that they were aware that one DPP officer had visited the offices of the FAFG regularly to verify the adequacy of the protection provided; therefore, this request had been satisfied. However, they pointed out that, even though the State reported that four additional officers had been assigned to protect the FAFG’s main office, the number of officers currently present at the FAFG is the same as before. 16. That the Inter-American Commission indicated that while it was commendable that meetings were held between the State and the representatives of the beneficiaries, especially taking into account the increased risk facing the members of the FAFG; that a security officer was appointed as coordinator of the implementation of the measures of protection, and that the State was willing to investigate the security officers assigned to protect Mr. Fredy Peccerelli and his family, the efficacy of the measures required coordination and adequate follow-up. 17. That, even though the State took immediate action in response to the incidents reported by the representatives and the Commission (supra Considering clause No. 12), such action has not been effective in preventing new incidents of threats and intimidation. Furthermore, the messages sent to the cell phone and email addresses of some members of the FAFG reveal that those behind such threats have detail and up-to-date information related to the beneficiaries and their relatives, which makes the situation particularly serious and dangerous. In light of that, it is essential for the State to adopt, forthwith, such measures as may be necessary to put an end to the situation facing the beneficiaries of these provisional measures. * * *