- 116 - IX REPARATIONS (Application of Article 63(1) of the American Convention) Psychological assessment of Osmín Tobar Ramírez provided by affidavit Karla Renee Lemus Barrios on May 8, 2017 (evidence file, folio 7059). 610 Article 63(1) of the American Convention establishes that: “[i]f the Court finds that there has been a violation of a right or freedom protected by this Convention, the Court shall rule that the injured party be ensured the enjoyment of his right or freedom that was violated. It shall also rule, if appropriate, that the consequences of the measure or situation that constituted the breach of such right or freedom be remedied and that fair compensation be paid to the injured party.” 611 Cf. Case of Velásquez Rodríguez v. Honduras. Reparations and costs. Judgment of July 21, 1989. Series C No. 7, para. 26, and Case of the Xucuru Indigenous People and its members v. Brazil. Preliminary objections, merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of February 5, 2018. Series C No. 346. para. 183. 612 Cf. Case of Velásquez Rodríguez v. Honduras. Reparations and costs, supra, para. 26, and Case of the Xucuru Indigenous People and its members v. Brazil, supra, para. 183. 613 Cf. Case of the Las Dos Erres Massacre v. Guatemala, supra, para. 226, and Case the Dismissed Workers of PetroPeru et al. v. Peru, supra, para. 195. 614 Cf. Case of Ticona Estrada et al. v. Bolivia, supra, para. 110, and Case of the Xucuru Indigenous People and its members v. Brazil, supra, para. 184. 615