73 uprooted, forcibly displaced and denied the right to a formal, comprehensive and quality education, so that now they are not sufficiently trained to insert themselves into a competitive labor market with access to decent remuneration.” The State referred to the scholarships it has granted, indicating that El Salvador has made progress in adopting measures to guarantee access to education with dignity for children, and to ensure that they have fair access and continuity in the education system. The State added that, as part of the Reparation Program for Victims of Serious Human Rights Violations during the armed conflict, it has considered granting scholarships for higher education and postgraduate studies for victims and their next of kin who are registered as such, and that a process of registration has already been carried out. Thus, the State agreed to promote this measure, and to offer opportunities for technical training to those who require it. 248. The representatives also asked the Court to order the State to reform all its domestic legislation to include provisions expressly prohibiting those accused of committing human rights violations from holding public office or any elected position or direct appointment to second tier positions. Similarly, they requested that the State be ordered “to comply with previous judgments delivered against it, especially with regard to not exalting the names of human rights violators, such as in the case of the Third Infantry Brigade, named ‘Colonel Domingo Monterrosa Barrios’ or the school named after Colonel Ernesto Vargas, in the Department of Morazán.” The State did not comment on that request. 249. The representatives further argued that the Search Association has been, and remains, the only organization that has concerned itself with responding to the clamor of the victims who have suffered the forced disappearance of their children, which has involved a major financial expenditure for the provision of holistic care. Therefore, the representatives requested that the State of El Salvador assume the historical debt in other cases of forced disappearance of children, allocating a percentage of the nation’s general budget to subsidize the Search Association’s work in those cases that have not yet been resolved, for a period of 10 years or for as long as the Court deems appropriate, considering the complexity of the problems of disappeared children. The State did not comment on that request. 250. The Court considers that this judgment and the reparations ordered therein are sufficient and adequate to compensate the victims for the violations suffered in the instant case,323 and therefore does not find it necessary to order the measures requested by the representatives. D. Compensation 1. Pecuniary damage 251. The Commission asked the Court to adequately compensate the victims in this case and to include both pecuniary and non-pecuniary aspects. The representatives asked the Court to order the State to pay pecuniary compensation to the victims in this case and to their next of kin for the pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages they suffered, especially those of an irreversible nature. In relation to loss of earnings, it considered that the State has “the obligation to compensate the family members in this case for the financial harm suffered directly because of the forced disappearance of their next of kin, which clearly implied a deterioration in their living conditions and in their mental and physical health and affected their productive capacity, given the emotional and social effects that the families of victims of these types of human rights violations are known to suffer.” They pointed out that, in order to estimate loss of earnings, in equity, it is necessary to take into account the victim’s age at the time of their forced disappearance, their life expectancy, their life project, the financial gains that they might have obtained and their income. As to consequential damages, they considered that certain related expenses should be included, such as medical treatment and medicines for the victims’ next of kin, the expenses incurred in the search for their children and in monitoring the Cf. Case of Radilla Pacheco v. Mexico, supra, para. 359, and Case of Human Rights Defender et al. v. Guatemala, supra, para. 281. 323