3. Satisfaction a) Publication and dissemination of this Judgment 119. The friendly settlement agreement does not establish this measure of satisfaction. However, in their pleadings and motions brief, the representatives asked that the Court order the publication of the Judgment, in both the Official Gazette and in two of the main newspapers. 120. In view of the significance and enormity of the violations declared, the Court orders that the State publish, once, within six months of notification of this judgment: (a) the official summary of the Judgment prepared by the Court in the Official Gazette; (b) the same official summary in a national newspaper with widespread circulation, and (c) this Judgment, in its entirety, available for at least one year on an appropriate official website, taking into account the characteristics of the publications ordered. b) Public act of acknowledgment of international responsibility 121. Under the friendly settlement agreement, the State made an acknowledgment of international responsibility during the public hearing on February 28, 2012 (supra paras. 14 and 15). In addition, in the agreement, the State undertook to organize an official public acknowledgment of international responsibility on May 17, 2013, for the victims and their next of kin in relation to the factual and legal issues established in the Commission’s Merits Report. Moreover, this public acknowledgment will be made by the President of the Republic and an invitation will be sent to the entire Cabinet, the heads of the Attorney General's Office, the Prosecutor General’s Office and the Supreme Court of Justice. In addition, the event must be organized in coordination with the representatives. 122. The Court assesses positively the State's willingness to organize a public act to acknowledge its international responsibility for the facts of this case and therefore endorses the measure. The State, with the collaboration of the representatives, must try, insofar as possible, to ensure that most of the victims' next of kin attend this ceremony. To this end, the State must facilitate, inter alia, the necessary transport and logistics for participants. 4. Other measures requested 123. In their pleadings and motions brief, the representatives asked the Court to order the State to provide other measures of reparation,122 which were not included in the friendly settlement agreement. In this regard, the Court finds that the delivery of this Judgment and the reparations ordered in this chapter are sufficient and appropriate to redress the violations suffered by the victims, and does not consider it necessary to order other 122 The representatives requested the following measures of reparation: (a) publication, at the State’s expense, of a document that systematizes and recovers the historical memory of the events, prepared by the representatives of the victims and their next of kin; (b) establishment of a foundation by the State, with its own legal personality, independent of the State, but attached to the Catholic Church, with the purpose of researching and studying the causes and consequences of violence in the country, as well as to support its victims; (c) agreement on and approval of a proposal and its corresponding socialization methods, presented by human rights and similar organizations, that defines new public safety policies; (d) a public act rejecting and abandoning the current public safety policies, especially those relating to the fight against organized crime, and (e) the formal installation of a commission, sworn in by the National Congress and composed of a multidisciplinary and interinstitutional team of human rights organizations and State agents to follow up on the judgment delivered in these proceedings, under the supervision of this Court. 34