CEJIL

- Livraria
- Sign in

Previous 41 / 47 Next

Normal view

So ordered, Diego García-Sayán President Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Secretary 41

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Uwazi is developed by
CEJIL
Livraria
Login

Info
14Relationships

Search Tips

Pesquisar texto

Type something in the search box to get some results.

I INTRODUCTION TO THE CASE AND PURPOSE OF THE DISPUTE 4
II PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT5
III JURISDICTION6
IV EVIDENCE6
A)Documentary, testimonial and expert evidence 6
B) Admission of the evidence 7
V ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY BY THE STTATE AND ENDORSEMENT OF THE FRIENDLY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 8
A. The friendly settlement agreement8
B. Considerations of the Court9
VI CONTEXT AND FACTS OF THE CASE 10
A. The prison system in Honduras 10
B. General conditions in the San Pedro Sula Prison 2
C. Specific conditions of cell No. 19 13
D. The fire in cell Nº 19 14
E. Causes of the fire 15
F. Situation of the victims’ next of kin 16
G. Judicial proceedings before the domestic courts 16
VII CONSIDERATIONS OF THE COURT REGARDING ARTICLES 4, 5, 7, 9, 8 AND 25, IN RELATION TO ARTICLES 1(1) AND 2 OF THE AMERICAN CONVENTION 17
A. The rights violated 17
B. Obligation of prevention with regard to prison conditions 19
C. The next of kin of the deceased 22
VIII REPARATIONS (Application of Article 63(1) of the American Convention under the friendly settlement agreement) 23
A. Injured Party 24
B. Beneficiaries of the friendly settlement agreement 25
C. Measures of integral reparation: guarantees of non-repetition, rehabilitation and satisfaction 2
1. Guarantees of non-repetition 26
2. Rehabilitation 33
3. Satisfaction 2
4. Other measures requested 34
D. Obligation to investigate the facts that gave rise to the violations, and to identify, prosecute and, as appropriate, punish those responsible 35
E. Compensation and opportunities fund 36
1. Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage 36
F. Means of compliance with the payments ordered 37
IX OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS 38
# SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE EDUARDO VIO GROSSI 42

Pacheco Teruel y otros. Sentença de 27 de abril de 2012

Sentença da Corte IDH

Preview

Tipo

Custas
Mérito
Reparaçoēs

Data: 27 de abr. de 2012

Mecanismo

Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos

Número: C-241

País

Honduras

Signatarios

Alberto Pérez Pérez
Diego García-Sayán
Eduardo Vio Grossi
Leonardo A. Franco
Manuel E. Ventura Robles
Margarette May Macaulay
Rhadys Abreu Blondet

Votos separados

Eduardo Vio Grossi

Primary Documents

Pacheco Teruel y otros. Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas. Sentencia de 27 de abril de 2012.pdf
Spanish
Download View
Pacheco Teruel et al. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of April 27, 2012.pdf
English
Download View

Supporting files

Pacheco Teruel et al. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of April 27, 2012.doc357.89 kB

Pacheco Teruel y otros. Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas. Sentencia de 27 de abril de 2012.doc397.82 kB

No References

References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

Signatários6
- Juíz/a e/o Comisionado/a6
País1
- País1
Mecanismo1
- Mecanismo1
Documentos da CorteIDH4
- Resolução da Corte IDH2
- Resolução da Presidência da CorteIDH1
- Audiência1
No Label1
- Processo1
Votos separados1
- Voto Separado1

Create Reference

Select relationship type

Relacionado a
CorteIDH
CIDH
Votos separados
Paises
Jueces intervinientes
País
Multi Select
Mecanismo
Firmantes
Sexo
Tipo
Firmante Voto separado
Estado
Descriptores
Geolocalización de los hechos del caso
Medidas de Protección

Search Tips

Notifications

You're all caught up

New activity will show up here.