12 34. That, even though there has been progress as to the negotiation of the place and the manner to carry out the act, it is evident the delay in its completion, taking into account that this obligation should have been complied with within the term of six months as of notice of the Judgment. Furthermore, it is necessary to emphasize that the effective compliance with this obligation must not depend on the payment of the compensations or on any other pending obligation. The will of the victims’ next-of-kin was expressed within the framework of the private hearing; therefore, the Tribunal urges the State to complete this measure as soon as possible and takes note that the State undertook to organize such act for Friday, December 11, 2009. * * * Publication of the Judgment That in relation to the obligation to publish in the official gazette and in another newspaper with widespread national circulation several parts of the Judgment (operative paragraph eight of the Judgment), the State furnished the documentation proving the publication of the parts of the Judgment in the Official Gazette, together with the missing chapter in the publication of September 17, 2008, of Official Registry N° 180. In addition, during the hearing, the State informed that the last September 23, “it was published the paragraphs required in La Nación newspaper, [...] of great circulation" and it also furnished evidence to that end. Moreover, apart from that, the judgment was read in radio shows, since the society has broad access to them. 35. 36. That the representatives stated that the publication was effectively made in the Official Gazette as well as in La Nación newspaper, as mentioned by the State. The Commission made no observations in that regard. 37. That this Court notes that, according to the terms of the Judgment, the State must have published the pertinent parts of the Judgment within the term of six months. The representatives informed the said parts have been published, and that the State furnished the evidence proving it. In this sense, this Court positively values what was informed and considers that the State has fully complied with this provision. * * * Appropriate treatment for the victims’ next-of-kin 38. That as to the obligation to provide all the next- of- kin of the disappeared victims with appropriate treatment (operative paragraph nine of the Judgment), the State informed during the hearing that on November 24, 2008, the Ministry of Public Health and Social Welfare issued the identity cards by means of which the victims’ next-of-kin have access to all national public health services and to medicines, free of charge. That, afterwards, on the last September 24, the Minister of Health, by means of a note addressed to the victims’ representative and because the delivery of the cards presented difficulties, communicated that said cards were at the offices of the Ministry. In relation to this aspect, the State also indicated that given that the Judgment stipulates "the consent of the victims", it requests the representatives to give their opinion regarding the “approach” that they claim from the State.