64 96.106 On December 9, 1999 the Criminal Appellate Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice ruled on the appeal filed by Nory Giraldo de Jaramillo (supra para. 96.105), upholding the October 15, 1999 decision of the Criminal Chamber of the High Court of the District of Bogotá (supra para. 96.104).108 96.107 On January 12, 2000 the General Secretariat of the Constitutional Court received from the Secretariat of the Criminal Appellate Chamber the amparo remedy filed by Nory Giraldo de Jaramillo, for its review (supra para. 96.104).109 96.108 On November 13, 2001 the Criminal Chamber of the Constitutional Court issued a ruling in the review process of the decisions issued during the processing of the amparo remedy filed by Nory Giraldo de Jaramillo. In this regard it decided to grant, for disregard of the competent tribunal, protection of the basic right to due process and, therefore, it revoked the rulings issued by the Criminal Chamber of the High Court of the Judicial District of Bogotá on October 15, 1999 and by the Criminal Appellate Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice on December 9, 1999 (supra paras. 96.104 and 96.106). It also declared the nullity of the August 18, 1999 decision (supra para. 96.92). Finally, it ordered the Disciplinary Jurisdictional Chamber of the High Council of the Judiciary to decide on the clash of jurisdiction within ten days of notification of said judgment.110 96.109 On February 21, 2002 the Disciplinary Jurisdictional Chamber of the High Council of the Judiciary decided on the clash of jurisdiction, finding that the proceeding should be heard by regular criminal venue, represented by the Human Rights Unit of the Office of the Attorney General, where the records were to be sent immediately.111 Continuation of the proceeding before regular criminal jurisdiction, once the clash over jurisdiction had been solved 96.110 On June 28, 2002 the National Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law Unit declared the nullity of the decisions of the criminal military courts and the case was returned to regular criminal venue, without affecting the evidence tendered and the actions taken by said Unit. It also granted release on bail to Brigadier General Jaime Humberto Uscátegui Ramírez, “since the legal requirements set forth in Article 365 paragraphs 4 and 15 of the Criminal Procedures Code have been met.”112 108 See December 9, 1999 ruling, issued by the Criminal Appellate Court of the Supreme Court of Justice (file with appendixes to the application, appendix 59, pages 929 to 941). 109 See application filed before the High Court of Bogotá on December 9, 1999 by Nory Giraldo de Jaramillo (file with appendixes to the application, appendix 56, page 867). 110 See judgment SU-1184 of November 13, 2001, issued by the Full Court of the Constitutional Court (file with appendixes to the application, appendix 60, pages 943 and 1005). 111 See February 21, 2002 ruling, issued by the High Council of the Judiciary (file with appendixes to the application, appendix 55, pages 841 and 857). 112 See June 28, 2002 decision by the National Human Rights Unit (file with appendixes to the application, appendix 44, pages 755 and 766).