67 First: To convict Carlos Castaño Gil, (r) Cr. Lino Hernando Sánchez Prado and Julio Enrique Florez, whose particulars are listed in this sentence, and as co-perpetrators of the conducts with which they have been formally charged; therefore, each of the accused is accordingly sentenced to forty (40) years in prison and additional punishment of loss of rights pertaining to public functions for twenty (20) years. Second: To convict, under the terms set forth, José Miller Ureña Díaz, whose particulars are listed in this sentence and as co-perpetrator […] by omission of the conducts with which he has been formally charged; therefore the accused is sentenced to thirty-two (32) years in prison and the additional punishment of loss of rights pertaining to public functions for twenty (20) years. Third: Under the terms set forth, Juan Carlos Gamarra Polo, whose particulars are listed in this sentence and as punishable perpetrator of conspiracy to commit a crime and an accomplice to aggravated homicide, terrorism and kidnapping, is sentenced to twentytwo (22) years in prison and the additional punishment of loss of rights pertaining to public functions for twenty (20) years. Fourth: To declare that the accused have no right to any benefit regarding release, in accordance [with] the aforementioned reasons. Fifth: Under the terms set forth, Carlos Castaño Gil, Julio Enrique Flores González, Juan Carlos Gamarra Polo, José Miller Ureña Díaz, Lino Hernando Sánchez Prado must pay damages due to the violations of the right to humane treatment in accordance [with] the content of the Whereas clauses of this judgment. Sixth: To acquit Helio Ernesto Buitrago in accordance with what has been noted, for which reason he will be given the benefit of release set forth in Article 365-3 of the CCP, after personal cognizance and signing a document of commitment […]119. 96.118 On July 7, 11 and 22, 2003 Carlos Castaño Gil, Julio Enrique Florez González, Juan Carlos Gamarra Polo and José Miller Urueña Díaz filed appeals before the High Court of Bogotá against the June 18, 2003 judgment (supra para. 96.117).120 96.119 On July 30, 2003 the Unit of the Deputy Public Prosecutors’ Offices before the High Court of Bogotá decided: First: To revoke point four of the decision [of March 10, 2003] and instead to file charges against retired Colonel Hernán Orozco Castro, allegedly liable, by improper omission, of the crimes of aggravated homicide in successive conspiracy, and concurrence of several culpable crimes with aggravated kidnapping, as stated in the instant decision. Second: To therefore order the preventive detention of Hernán Orozco Castro […] whose civil and personal particulars are known in this proceeding, issuing the respective arrest warrant. Third: With the clarifications made before, to uphold in all its parts the other points of the challenged decision. Fourth: The point on “Other rulings” must be carried out.” [It is necessary given the magnitude of the facts investigated, to attain clarity regarding all the participants in those events; therefore, orders will be forwarded to investigate the possible liability of civil, military and police authorities, in the municipalities of Apartadó and Neclocí in the Department of Antioquia, the locations or corregimientos of Charras, Barrancón, La 119 See June 18, 2003 conviction, issued by the Second Criminal Court of the Specialized Circuit of Bogotá (file with appendixes to the application, appendix 4, pages 115, 156 a) to c)). 120 See appeals filed on July 7, 11 and 22, 2003 by Carlos Castaño Gil, Julio Enrique Florez González, Juan Carlos Gamarra Polo and José Miller Ureña Díaz, before the High Court of Bogotá (file with evidence to facilitate adjudication submitted by the representatives).