66 2. Finds that the State violated Article 7(5) of the American Convention on Human Rights. By seven votes to one, 3. Finds that the State violated Article 9 of the American Convention on Human Rights. Judge Vidal-Ramírez dissenting. Unanimously 4. Finds that the State violated Article 8(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights. Unanimously 5. Finds that the State violated Article 8(2)(b), (c), (d) and (f) of the American Convention on Human Rights. By seven votes to one 6. Finds that the State violated Article 8(2)(h) of the American Convention on Human Rights. Judge Vidal-Ramírez dissenting. Unanimously 7. Finds that it was not proven in the instant case that the State violated Article 8(3) of the American Convention on Human Rights. By seven votes to one 8. Finds that the State violated Article 8(5) of the American Convention on Human Rights. Judge Vidal-Ramírez dissenting. Unanimously 9. Finds that the State violated articles 25 and 7(6) of the American Convention on Human Rights. By seven votes to one 10. Finds that the State violated Article 5 of the American Convention on Human Rights. Judge Vidal-Ramírez dissenting. Unanimously

Select target paragraph3