14 Panamá” newspaper entitled "Panamanian democracy being demolished," published December 16, 1990; two copies of the articles of the “La Estrella de Panamá” newspaper entitled "Colonel Herrera calls for reconciliation to prevent blood bath," and "Labour union representative Rodríguez proposes leaving his position and having the workers reinstated," published December 17, 1990; an article of the “La Estrella de Panamá” newspaper entitled "Serious attack against freedom in Panama reported," published December 17, 1990; three copies of the articles of the “La Estrella de Panamá” newspaper entitled "Assembly asked to reconsider," published December 18, 1990; an article of the “La Estrella de Panamá” newspaper entitled "Presidential advisors are the culprits," published December 19, 1990; two copies of the article of the “La Estrella de Panamá” newspaper entitled "World-level sanctions against Panama could be imposed," published December 21, 1990; two copies of article of the “La Estrella de Panamá” newspaper entitled "March scheduled for today suspended," published December 24, 1990; two copies of the article of the “La Estrella de Panamá” newspaper entitled "Labour union leaders suspend hunger strike and accept mediation," published December 25, 1990; an article of the “La Estrella de Panamá” newspaper entitled "Draft bill on dismissals to first debate," published December 12, 1990; an article of the “La Estrella de Panamá” newspaper entitled "…disagreement between the government and labour unions," published December 13, 1990; an article of the “La Estrella de Panamá” newspaper entitled "Violence between workers and the police. 13 wounded," published December 14, 1990; articles of the “La Estrella de Panamá” newspaper entitled "Passing of law leads to serious disturbances," and "Labour unions announce march for Monday," published December 15, 1990; articles of the La Prensa newspaper of Panama, entitled "Public employees say government measures are anti democratic," and "Strike at IRHE centres announced by Isaac Rodríguez," published December 12, 1990; an article of the La Prensa newspaper of Panama entitled "No co-ordination possible with a non-representative leadership," published December 13, 1990; articles of the La Prensa newspaper of Panama entitled "Sense of authority not clear in the society: Márquez," and "Pope encourages Panamanians and calls for a fairer society," published December 14, 1990; articles of the La Prensa newspaper of Panama entitled "Herrera takes over Central Fort," and "Public employees who support strike could be dismissed," published December 5, 1990; articles of the La Prensa newspaper of Panama entitled "Coup thwarted," and "Workers deny ties with coup attempt," published December 6, 1990; two copies of articles of the La Prensa newspaper of Panama entitled "Public employees who took part in strike of the 5th to be dismissed," published December 7, 1990; an article of the La Prensa newspaper of Panama entitled "Bethancourt Doctrine implementation best remedy against dictatorships," published December 8, 1990; an article of the La Prensa newspaper of Panama entitled "Isaac Rodríguez met yesterday with Cruz Loaiza and Carlos Barés," published December 9, 1990; two copies of the article of the La Prensa newspaper of Panama entitled "Attorney General Cruz to interrogate Eduardo Herrera tomorrow," published December 10, 1990; two copies of the article of the La Prensa newspaper of Panama entitled "Moreno alleges involvement of police Directorate in coup," published December 11, 1990; appendix III, a segment of the 1989-1990 Annual Report of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights concerning the State of Panama; appendix IV, a segment of the 1990-1991 Annual Report of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights; appendix V, Law 25 draft bill; appendix VI, an article of the El Panamá América newspaper entitled "Draft to punish coup perpetrators," published December 10, 1990; an article of the El Panamá América newspaper entitled "Three coup participants apply for asylum," published December 9, 1990; an article of the El Panamá América newspaper entitled "US troops acted unilaterally," published December 8, 1990; an article of the El Panamá América newspaper entitled "Special commission to investigate coup," published December 8, 1990; an article of the “La Estrella de Panamá” newspaper entitled "Co-ordinating organisation announces protest outside US Embassy and a march," published December 12, 1990; an article of the “La Estrella de Panamá” newspaper entitled "Dismissals draft bill goes to first debate," published December 12, 1990; two copies of the article of the “La Estrella de Panamá” newspaper entitled "Serious disagreement between the government and labour unions," published December 13, 1990; two copies of the article of the “La Estrella de Panamá” newspaper entitled "Violence between workers and the police. 13 wounded," published December 14, 1990; an article of the “La Estrella de Panamá” newspaper entitled "Dismissals law passed yesterday at second debate," published December 14, 1990; two copies of the article of the “La Estrella de Panamá” newspaper entitled "Law approval leads to serious turmoil." Published December 15, 1990; an article of the “La Estrella de Panamá” newspaper entitled "Events announced for the 20th, and a march for the 24th," without a reference; appendix VII, minutes of the Legislative Assembly of December 13, 1990 relative to the discussion on Law 25. Appendix VIII, judgment of the Full Supreme Court of May 23, 1991, concerning the three unconstitutionality actions brought by Vicente ArchiboldBlake in representation of Isaac Rodríguez; by Santander Tristán-Donoso et al.; and by Basilio ChongGómez in representation of Rolando Miller et al., against Law 25 of December 14, 1990; opinion of March 21, 1991 by the Office of the Administrative Attorney of the Prosecutorial Agency, concerning the three unconstitutionality actions brought by Vicente Archibold-Blake, in representation of Isaac Rodríguez; by Santander Tristán-Donoso et al.; and by Basilio Chong-Gómez, in representation of Rolando Miller et al., against Law 25 of December 14, 1990; unconstitutionality action brought December 21, 1990, before the Full Supreme Court of Panama by Vicente Archibold-Blake in representation of Isaac Rodríguez; appendix IX, warning of unconstitutionality of Law 25 of December 14, 1990, filed May 7, 1991, before the Third Administrative Conflicts Section of the Supreme Court of Panama, by Carlos del Cid in representation of