65 p. in its Article 1, Law 25 authorised the dismissal of those public servants “who had participated and who would participate in the organisation, convocation or implementation of actions that attempt against democracy and the constitutional order.” In the “paragraph” of Article 2 of said Law, the Cabinet Council was designated as the authority in charge of defining the actions of public servants that were deemed contrary to democracy and the constitutional order, in order to be able to apply the dismissal administrative sanction;38 Sosa-C., Sonia de-Smith, and Damiel S. Trejos-G.; "Preliminary report prepared by the Dismissed Workers' Committee concerning the obligations pending payment to the workers dismissed pursuant to Law 25 of December 14, 1990, in the Republic of Panama;” judgment of the Third Administrative Conflicts Section of the Supreme Court of June 30, 1993 in connection with the full-jurisdiction administrative conflicts actions brought by Carlos del-Cid, in representation of Tilsia M.-de-Paredes, Marisol Matos, Nemesio Nieves-Quintana, Antonio Núñez, Regino Ramírez, Mireya de-Rodríguez, Ricardo Simons, Errol Vaciannie, Walter Vega., Eduardo Williams, Marco Tovar and Jorge Murillo; judgment of the Administrative Conflicts Section of the Supreme Court of December 18, 1992, relative to the actions brought by Vicente Archibold-Blake, in representation of Eduardo Gaslín-Caballero, Alfredo Guerra, Raúl González-Rodaniche, Melva Guerrero-Samudio, Esther M. Guerra, Evangelista Granja-C., Antonio González, Erick Alexis González, Manuel J. Herrera-S., Aníbal Herrera-Santamaría, Félix Herrera-C., Magaly V.-de-Herrera, Pompilio Ibarra-Ramírez, Daniel Jiménez-H., Rolando Jiménez, José A. Kellys-S., Gilberto Antonio Leguisamo, Dirie Lauchú -Ponce, Perlina Loban -de-Andrade, Eric E. Lara-Moran, Darien C. Linares, Zilka A. Lou-M.-, Dennis Lasso-E., Orán Darío Miranda-Gutiérrez, Luis E. Montero, Valentín Morales-V., Raúl Murrieta-Ríos, Natalio Murillo, Jorge Martínez-F., Luis A. Miranda, Esteban Nash-Campos, Evelio Otero-Rodríguez, Antonio A. Ornano-C., Gustavo Alexis Ortiz-G., Luis H. Osorio, and Omar E. Oses; judgment of the Third Administrative Conflicts Section of the Supreme Court of July 30, 1993, in connection with the actions brought by Carlos del-Cid, in representation of Ivanor Alonso, Arnoldo AguilarU., Lionel Ángulo-C., Carlos Catline, Judith E. de-la-Rosa-de-Correa, Alfonso Chambers, Eduardo Cobos, Orlando Camarena, Alexis Díaz, Edgar de-León, Luis Coronado, and Elberto Luis Cobos; a listing of workers dismissed on the basis of Law 25 of December 14, 1990, who had not been reinstated by the time the appendices to the application had been submitted; volume I of the record of the proceedings before the Administrative Conflicts Section of the Supreme Court in connection with the full-jurisdiction administrative conflicts actions brought by Vicente Archibold Blake, in representation of Magaly V. deHerrera, Félix Herrera-C., Aníbal Herrera-Santamaría, Manuel J. Herrera-S., Eric Alexis González, Antonio González, Evangelista Granja-C., Esther M. Guerra, Melva Guerrero-Samudio, Raúl González-Rodaniche, Alfredo Guerra, and Eduardo Gaslín-Caballero; volume I of the record of the proceedings before the Administrative Conflicts Section of the Supreme Court in connection with the full-jurisdiction administrative conflicts actions brought by Carlos del-Cid in representation of Yadira Delgado, Luis Alfonso Estribi-R., Alfonso Fernández-Urriola, Eleno Augusto García-Castro, Alejandrina Gordon-Rivera, Ricardo Antonio Guiseppitt-Pérez, Rigoberto Isaacs-Rozzi, and Marisol Landau; volume I of the record of the case before the Administrative Conflicts Section of the Supreme Court, concerning the full-jurisdiction administrative conflicts actions brought by Vicente Archibold-Blake, in representation of Luis Anaya, Juan Bautista Quijada-B., Cayetano Cruz, and Jaime E. Camarena; volume I of the record of the case before the Administrative Conflicts Section of the Supreme Court, concerning the full-jurisdiction administrative conflicts actions brought by Vicente Archibold-Blake, in representation of Andrés A. Aleman -L., Santiago Alvarado, Pedro Atencio-Madrid, Javier Atencio-Arauz, Víctor Arauz-Núñez, Rubén D. Barraza, Luis BernuilZ., Alba Oritela-Berrio, José Inés Blanco-Obando, and Jaime A. Batista; volume I of the record of the case before the Administrative Conflicts Section of the Supreme Court, concerning the full-jurisdiction administrative conflicts actions brought by Carlos del-Cid in representation of Ivanor Alonso, Arnoldo Aguilar-U., Lionel Angulo-C, Luis Coronado, Elberto Luis Cobos, Carlos Catline-Todd, Judith de-la-Rosa-deCorrea, and Alfonso Chambers; and record of the case before the Full Supreme Court concerning the three unconstitutionality actions brought by Vicente Archibold-Blake, in representation of Isaac Rodríguez; by Santander Tristán-Donoso et al; and by Basilio Chong-Gómez, in representation of Rolando Miller et al., against Law 25 of December 14, 1990. 38 cfr. Law 25 of December 14, 1990, published in the Official Gazette of Panama N° 21.687 of December 17, 1990; testimony of Ramón Lima-Camargo delivered before the Inter-American Court on January 26, 2000; report of the expert Humberto Ricord, delivered before the Inter-American Court on January 26 , 2000; testimony of Guillermo Endara-Galimany delivered before the Inter-American Court on January 27, 2000; report of the expert Maruja Bravo-Dutary, delivered before the Inter-American Court on January 27, 2000; Cabinet Council Resolution N° 10 of January 23, 1991, published in the Official Gazette of Panama N° 21.718, of February 4, 1991; judgment of the Full Supreme Court of May 23, 1991, concerning the three unconstitutionality actions brought December 21 and 24, 1990, by Vicente Archibold-Blake in representation of Isaac Rodríguez; by Santander Tristán-Donoso et al.; and by Basilio Chong-Gómez in representation of Rolando Miller et al., against Law 25 of December 14, 1990; minutes