ORDER OF THE
INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
OF SEPTEMBER 22, 2006
CASE OF LOAYZA-TAMAYO V. PERU
MONITORING COMPLIANCE WITH JUDGMENT *

HAVING SEEN:
1.
The Judgment on the merits delivered by the Inter-American Court of Human
Rights (hereinafter “the Court” or the “Inter-American Court”) in the instant case on
September 17, 1997.
2.

The Judgment on reparations delivered by the Court on November 27, 1998.

3.
The Judgment on Interpretation delivered by the Inter-American Court in the
instant case on June 3, 1999.
4.
The Order of the Court of June 1, 2001 on compliance with judgment in the
Cases of Castillo-Páez, Loayza-Tamayo, Castillo-Petruzzi et al,, Ivcher-Bronstein and
the Constitutional Court, whereby the Court decided:
1.
To take note of the compliance by the State of Peru with the judgments on
competence of September 24, 1999, in the Constitutional Court and Ivcher Bronstein
cases and of the progress made, up until the date that this order was issued, in
compliance with the judgments delivered by the Court in the Castillo Páez, Loayza
Tamayo, Castillo Petruzzi et al., Ivcher Bronstein and Constitutional Court cases.
[…]

5.
The Order on compliance with judgment rendered by the Court on November
27, 2002, whereby it decided:
1.
That the State ha[d] a duty to adopt all necessary measures to comply
effective[ly] and promptly with the judgment on reparations of November 27, 1998,
delivered by the Inter-American court of Human Rights in the case of Loayza-Tamayo,
as established in Article 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights.
[…]

*

Judge Oliver Jackman did not take part in the deliberations on and signing of this Order as he
advised the Court that, for reasons beyond his control, he would be unable to be present at the Seventysecond Regular Session of the Court.

Select target paragraph3