11 necessary for representatives to clarify the fee rates on payments and to determine whether it has fully complied with this reparation measure. Consequently, the State and the representatives are asked to submit updated and detailed information in this regard, including the supporting documentation that appropriately attests the information provided. i) The request for the authorization of payment of up to 30% for home purchases in favor of three children 43. Through Order of May 25, 2010, the Court authorized " the transfer of up to thirty percent (30%) of the compensation to the three children of Ms. María Olive Calle (Deisy Tatiana, Johan Daniel and Cristian de Jesús Calle Fernandez), child victims in this case. Such payment would be received by Ms. Calle, as the mother of the aforementioned minors, specifically to purchase a home," according to the first operative paragraph of the Order ( supra Having Seen 8). 44. Representatives and the State jointly requested the Court to authorize the payment of "approximately USD 2.000, to [ensure] the acquisition of housing for the said minors." The State in turn supported the representatives' initiative aimed at increasing the percentage given to Ms. Calle as part of the amount requested, equivalent to approximately two thousand (U.S. 2000) United States Dollars," and stated that "the additional amount requested to acquire housing cannot be paid by the State without a prior Order of the [Court] authorizing it to do so." 45. Regarding the Commission it said it had no observations . 46. Given the Order of May 25, 2010 and the parties’ statements, the President considers it appropriate to request the State to proceed immediately, pursuant to the terms agreed, to complete the acquisition of the property on behalf of minors Deisy Tatiana, Johan Daniel and Cristian de Jesús Calle Fernández. The State and the representatives are requested to provide updated information to the Court in this regard . j) Call to a hearing 47. At this monitoring compliance with the Judgment stage, the President considered it appropriate to convene a closed hearing for the Court to receive, in accordance with the provisions of Article 69 of its Rules of Procedure, complete and detailed information from the State on compliance with the reparation measures so ordered in the Judgment and to listen to the respective observations from the Inter-American Commission and the representatives. THEREFORE: THE PRESIDENT OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, in exercising its authority to monitor compliance with its decisions in accordance with Articles 33, 67, and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, Article 24(1), 25(1) and 25(2) of the Statue, and Article 4, 15(1), 31 and 69 of its Rules of Procedure, AND RESOLVES:

Select target paragraph3