12 69. As evidence, the State attached 60 documents contained in 9 appendices to its brief answering the application (supra paras. 21 and 32)8. 70. The State forwarded 6 documents when submitting its comments on the brief on requests, arguments and evidence of the representatives of the alleged victims and their next of kin (supra para. 24)9. 71. The representatives of the alleged victims and their next of kin attached two documents contained in one appendix to the brief with arguments concerning a possible preliminary objection submitted by the State in its answer to the application (supra paras. 21 and 28)10. 72. The State attached two documents when presenting its brief with comments on the powers of attorney provided by the representatives of the alleged victims and their next of kin (supra paras. 25, 27 and 29)11. The representatives of the alleged victims and their next of kin attached two appendices containing 21 documents with On July 2, 2002, the brief clarifying the powers of attorney (supra para. 33)12. Carlos Torres Benvenuto forwarded a copy of the power of attorney for the proceeding before the Court13. representatives of the alleged victims and their next of kin on April 22, 2002 (folios 530 to 535 of Tome III of the file on merits and possible reparations); and a more legible copy of appendix 5 presented by the representatives of the alleged victims and their next of kin on May 3, 2002 (folio 576 bis of Tome III of the file on merits and possible reparations). 8 Cf. appendices 1 to 7 of the brief in answer to the application of March 15, 2002, presented by the State on April 18, 2002 (folios 314 to 470 of Tome II of the file on merits and possible reparations) and Appendices 8 and 9 of this brief presented on June 3, 2002 (folios 649 to 667 of Tome III of the file on merits and possible reparations). 9 Cf. appendices 1 and 2 of the brief presented on April 22, 2002, by the State, with its comments to the brief on requests, arguments and evidence of the representatives of the alleged victims and their next of kin, transmitted by the State on April 30, 2002 (folios 558 to 571 of Tome III of the file on merits and possible reparations). 10 Cf. appendix 1 of the brief of May 21, 2002, with the arguments of the representatives of the alleged victims and their next of kin on a possible preliminary objection presented by the State in the answer to the application, presented on May 28, 2002 (folios 639 to 644 of Tome III of the file on merits and possible reparations). 11 Cf. appendices 1 and 2 of the State’s brief of May 22, 2002 (folios 614 and 615 of Tome III of the file on merits and possible reparations). 12 Cf. appendices 1 and 2 of the brief presented by the representatives of the alleged victims and their next of kin on June 14, 2002 (folios 676 to 706 of Tome IV of the file on merits and possible reparations). 13 Cf. folios 786 and 787 of Tome IV of the file on merits and possible reparations.