78 185. With regard to the phrase in the SBS decisions that indicated “the right of the SBS to deduct, in accordance with the judgment of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, the amount that may have been paid in excess,” this Court considers that this reservation in the SBS decisions has no effect (supra para. 119). 186. In accordance with its constant practice, the Court reserves the right to monitor full compliance with this judgment. The case will be closed when the State has fully applied its provisions. Within one year from notification of this judgment, the State must provide the Court with a report on the measures taken to comply with the said judgment. XIII OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS 187. Therefore THE COURT, unanimously, 1. Declares that the State violated the right to property embodied in Article 21 of the American Convention on Human Rights, as stated in paragraphs 93 to 121 of this judgment, to the detriment of Carlos Torres Benvenuto, Javier Mujica RuizHuidobro, Guillermo Álvarez Hernández, Maximiliano Gamarra Ferreyra and Reymert Bartra Vásquez. 2. Declares that the State violated the right to judicial protection embodied in Article 25 of the American Convention on Human Rights, as stated in paragraphs 125 to 141 of this judgment, to the detriment of Carlos Torres Benvenuto, Javier Mujica Ruiz-Huidobro, Guillermo Álvarez Hernández, Maximiliano Gamarra Ferreyra and Reymert Bartra Vásquez. 3. Declares that the State failed to comply with the general obligations of Articles 1(1) and 2 of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to the violations of the substantive rights indicated in the preceding operative paragraphs, as stated in paragraphs 161 to 168 of this judgment. 4. Declares that this judgment constitutes per se a form of reparation for the victims, as stated in paragraph 180 of this judgment. 5. Decides that the possible patrimonial consequences of the violation of the right to property should be established under domestic legislation, by the competent national organs. 6. Decides that the State must conduct the corresponding investigations and apply the pertinent punishments to those responsible for failing to abide by the judicial decisions delivered by the Peruvian courts during the applications for protective measures filed by the victims. 7. Decides that, as indicated in paragraph 190 of this judgment, in fairness, the State must pay the four victims and Maximiliano Gamarra Ferreyra’s widow the amount of US$3,000.00 (three thousand United States dollars) for non-pecuniary