CEJIL

4 March 5, 2003 Sergio García-Ramírez Judge Manuel E. Ventura-Robles Secretary

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Search Tips

Type something in the search box to get some results.

I INTRODUCTION OF THE CASE 1
II COMPETENCE2
III PROCEEDING BEFORE THE COMMISSION 2
IV PROCEEDING BEFORE THE COURT4
V THE EVIDENCE 10
A) DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE 11
B) TESTIMONIAL AND EXPERT EVIDENCE 14
C) ASSESSMENT OF THE EVIDENCE 19
VI PROVEN FACTS 19
VII VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 21 (RIGHT TO PROPERTY)42
VIII VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 25 (JUDICIAL PROTECTION) 51
IX ARTICLE 26 (PROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS61
X ARTICLE 8 (RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL) 64
XI NON-COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLES 1(1) AND 2 (OBLIGATION TO RESPECT RIGHTS AND DOMESTIC LEGAL EFFECTS)69
XII APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 63(1) 71
XIII OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS78
# CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE A.A. CANÇADO TRINDADE81
# REASONED CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE SERGIO GARCÍA RAMÍREZ 88
# REASONED OPINION OF JUDGE DE ROUX RENGIFO 92

IACourt judgment

Type

Mechanism

Country

Signatories

Separate vote

Five Pensioners. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment. February 28, 2003.pdf
English
Download View
Cinco Pensionistas. Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas. Sentencia de 28 de febrero de 2003.pdf
Spanish
Download View
Cinco Pensionistas. Sentença de 28 de fevereiro de 2003.pdf
Portuguese
Download View

References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

Select relationship type

Search Tips

Connect to a paragraph

Connect to an entity

Disable highlights

Add to table of contents

You're all caught up

New activity will show up here.