4 Association of Private Banks which indicates that on two occasions “the Associates were notified” of the request to inform all member entities of the Judgment issued by this Court in the instant case.8 Likewise, it submitted a brief from the Superintendence of Banks whereby that institution “ordered the distribution of [the Court Judgment] to the financial institutions so that they would eliminate from their records all reference to Mr. Chaparro and Mr. Lapo as authors or suspects of a crime as a consequence of the ‘Operación Antinarcótica Rivera’ (Rivera Anti-narcotics Operation), and to note that they were processed by the State in violation of their human rights, and released of all responsibility by the national judicial authorities themselves.” 9 12. That the representatives indicated that “the only communication that [the State] has sent to a private institution was to the Private Bank Association, but that they consider this measure insufficient, therefore during the following days they will submit to the State a list of private institutions to whom the victims wish the communications to be delivered.” Subsequently, in the last report from March 25, 2009, they indicated that they are “waiting for the [State] to demand of the different private institutions identified by the victim to eliminate all records where Mr. Chaparro appears as accused of a crime.” 13. That the Commission indicated that it was awaiting the information from the State regarding “other effective measures for compliance with the obligation to eliminate the criminal records of the victims from the records of private entities.” 14. That the Court recognizes that the State has performed advances regarding compliance with this obligation and that both the Association of Private Banks and the Superintendence of Banks have communicated to the institutions in the financial system the decision of this Court. 15. That the representatives have not informed the Court which are the other private institutions to which the State must request elimination of any reference to Mr. Chaparro and Mr. Lapo as accused of a crime. 16. That following the foregoing explanation, the Court declares that the State has partially complied with operative paragraph nine, and orders that the representatives must communicate to the Court, within the term established in the operative paragraphs of the present Order, which are the other private institutions which they refer to. Additionally, the State must inform, within the term established in the operative paragraphs of this Order, which are the additional measures that it has taken to comply with this operative paragraph. * * * 17. That the order of the Court to publicize the Judgment issued in the instant case, in conformity with operative paragraph ten of that Judgment, entails four obligations of the State, namely: a) publish the parts pertinent to the Judgment in the Official Gazette; b) publish the parts pertinent to the Judgment in another newspaper of ample national circulation; c) disseminate the Judgment by radio and television, and d) perform a publication which specifically shows the information ordered by the Court in paragraph 263 of the Judgment. 8 Communication PE-058-2008 issued by the Executive President of the Association of Private Banks of Ecuador on January 31, 2008 (file on monitoring compliance, Vol. I, folio 200). 9 Official letter No. SBS-INJ-2008-0155, supra note 6 (file on monitoring compliance, Vol. I, folio 204).