must be observed by the Supreme Electoral Board to determine such non-compliance, and the decisions that must be taken by the Board in this regard, as well as the rights of those persons whose participation is affected by a State ruling (Operative Paragraph 10 of the Judgment[...]); c) To reform the regulation of the requirements provided for in Electoral Law No. 331 of 2000 that were declared to be in violation of the American Convention and to adopt the necessary measures so that members of the indigenous and ethnic communities can participate in electoral processes in an effective manner, taking into account their traditions, uses, and customs (Operative Paragraph 11 of the Judgment[...]); d) To publicize via a radio station with widespread coverage on the Atlantic Coast the paragraphs indicated in Chapter VII (Proven Facts), Chapters IX and X, and the Operative Paragraphs of the Judgment (Operative Paragraph 8 of the Judgment[...]). And decid[ed]: […] 2. To request that the State of Nicaragua submit to the Court the timeline referred to in Considering paragraph 25 of the […] Order, by no later than September 6, 2010. 3. To request that the State of Nicaragua present a report every four months on advances in achieving the goals established in the timeline, as well as reporting on compliance with the points of the Judgment that are pending fulfillment [...]. 3. The Order of the Court issued on June 30, 2011, whereby it decided to request the State, inter alia: […] 2. To […] present information to the Court on the steps it has taken pursuant to Operative Paragraph 1 of this Order and to submit the timeline it proposed by October 4, 2011, pursuant to Considering Clauses 7 and 10 [thereof]. 3. That […] after presenting the report mentioned in the previous operative paragraph, [to submit] a report once every four months on compliance with those operative paragraphs of the Judgment still outstanding, as well as on advances made with respect to the goals established in the timeline, where and when it is appropriate. […] 4. The briefs of October 19, 2011, June 19, 2012, and March 4, 2013, whereby the representatives of the victims (hereinafter “the representatives”) submitted information regarding the monitoring of compliance with the Judgment. 5. The notes from the Secretariat of the Court (hereinafter “the Secretariat”) of October 26, 2011, February 16, 2012, May 24, 2012, and June 29, 2012, whereby it requested the Republic of Nicaragua (hereinafter “the State” or “Nicaragua”) to report on the measures it had adopted to comply with the reparations ordered in the Judgment that were still pending compliance, as well as to forward the timeline proposed by the State, whose deadline for submission had expired on October 4, 2011 (supra Having Seen clause 3). The State did not submit the information requested. Similarly, the note of the Secretariat of April 16, 2013, whereby the President of the Court summoned the State, the representatives, and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Commission” or “the Commission”) to a private hearing on monitoring compliance with the Judgment, to be held on May 28, 2013. 6. The private hearing convened by the Court and held at its seat in San Jose, Costa Rica on May 28, 2013. 1 The State did not appear at this hearing. 1 At this hearing, the following were present: a) for the Inter-American Commission: Silvia Serrano Guzmán, Special Attorney for the Executive Secretary, and b) for the representatives of the victims: Brooklyn 2