ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF NOVEMBER 22, 2010 CASE OF BAYARRI V. ARGENTINA MONITORING COMPLIANCE WITH JUDGMENT HAVING SEEN: 1. The Judgment on preliminary objections, merits, reparations, and costs (hereinafter the “Judgment”) delivered by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter the “Court,” the “Inter-American Court,” or the “Tribunal”) on October 30, 2008, whereby, inter alia, the Court: DECLAR[ED THAT]: […] 8. The State must pay Mr. Juan Carlos Bayarri the amounts referred to in paragraphs 141, 142, 151, 155, 159, 170, and 194 of the […] Judgment, as compensation for pecuniary and nonpecuniary damages, as well as expenses and fees incurred, within one year of the date of notification of the […] Judgment […]. 9. The State must immediately provide Mr. Juan Carlos Bayarri with the free medical care he requires and must do so for as long as necessary […]. 10. The State must conclude the criminal proceedings begun as a result of the events that led to the violations in the present case and adjudicate the matter in accordance with applicable law […]. 11. The State must publish in the Official Gazette and in two other publications with a wide national circulation, on just one occasion, Chapters I, VII, VIII and IX of the […] Judgment, without the corresponding footnotes and the operative paragraphs of the Judgment, within six months of the date of notification of the […] Judgment […]. 12. The State must ensure that Mr. Juan Carlos Bayarri’s name is duly and immediately purged from all public records in which he appears with a criminal history […]. 13. The State must include, if it has not already done so, members of security services and the investigatory and administrative bodies of its legal system in its activities to create awareness and greater education on the prevention of torture and cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment [...]. 2. The briefs of January 8, February 3, and February 24, 2010, and annexes, whereby the Argentine Republic (hereinafter the “State” or “Argentina”) presented information on progress made towards compliance with the Judgment handed down by the Tribunal in the present case. 3. The brief of April 5, 2010, and its annexes, whereby the representatives of the victim (hereinafter the “representatives”) presented their observations on the information submitted by the State (supra Having Seen 2).