13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. applicable, effectively apply the penalties and consequences established by law; also, it shall impose the appropriate disciplinary, administrative or criminal measures if the investigation into the aforementioned facts reveals procedural or investigative irregularities in relation thereto, according to […] this Judgment. The State shall, within the term of six months, issue the publications ordered, under the terms of […] this Judgment. The State shall pay each of the victims once only, within a term of two months, the amount specified in […] this Judgment, to cover specialized medical and psychological treatment, as well as for medicines and other related expenses. The State shall introduce, within a reasonable time, the appropriate legislative reforms in order to bring Article 57 of the Code of Military Justice into line with international standards on the matter and with the American Convention on Human Rights, and adopt the pertinent legislative reforms so that individuals subject to intervention by the military courts have an effective remedy to challenge their jurisdiction, under the terms of […] this Judgment. The State shall adopt, within a reasonable period of time and within the framework of existing register of detainees in Mexico, appropriate supplementary measures in order to reinforce the operation and usefulness of said system, according to the terms of […] this Judgment. The State shall continue to implement training programs and permanent courses for the diligent investigation of cases of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment and torture, as well as to strengthen the State’s institutional capabilities by means of training programs for the Mexican Armed Forces on the principles and rules governing the protection of human rights, including the restrictions to which they are subject, according to […] this Judgment. The State shall pay the amounts specified in […] this Judgment, as compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages and reimbursement of legal costs and expenses, where applicable, within the term of one year, under the terms of paragraphs 260 to 261. 3. The reports of December 21, 2011 and December 20, 2012, in which the State referred to its compliance with the Judgment. 4. The briefs of March 16, 2012 and February 13, 2013, in which the representatives of the victims (hereinafter “the representatives”) presented observations on the aforementioned State’s reports. 5. The briefs of May 2, 2012 and May 30, 2013, through which the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Commission” or “the Commission”) submitted observations on the information provided by the State and the representatives. CONSIDERING THAT: 1. One of the inherent attributes of the jurisdictional functions of the Court is to monitor compliance with its decisions. 2