implemented measures can be assessed and, if necessary, modified so that they can be provided effectively. 2. Request that the State, by no later than May 11, 2014, report on the measures it has taken to comply with this Order, the assessment of the risk of Mr. Danilo Rueda, and the results, and request that the representatives of the beneficiaries and the InterAmerican Commission on Human Rights submit their observations on that report within five to seven days, respectively, counted as of receipt of the State’s notification. […] 9. The brief of May 9, 2014, wherein the State noted that: a) "upon analyzing Mr. Danilo Reuda’s situation and agreeing upon the required protection measures, the petitioner proposed a meeting for May 2 of this year.” According to the State, by way of a letter dated April 30, 2014, the CIJP rejected the proposed meeting and instead, on May 6, 2014, sent a proposal in which it presented some considerations and requests concerning the general situation faced by the inter-Church Justice and Peace Commission, not directly related to the Mr. Danilo Rueda’s specific case. In this regard, it noted that "the organization does not separate the particular and individual situation of Mr. Danilo Rueda from the overall risk faced by [CIJP]"; 7 b) by way of an official letter dated May 7, 2014, the National Protection Unit “reported that[,] in order to comply with the orders of the [Acting President of] the Court in its order of May 2, 2014[, ] that institution requested emergency processing and Risk Level Assessment for Mr. Danilo Rueda.” However, on May 8, 2014, the National Protection Unit reported that it had been unable to contact the proposed beneficiary to move forward with the emergency processing 8; 7 “1) the grouping together of cases related to the [Inter-Church] Justice and Peace Commission to systematically assess the cases in such a way that the investigation carried out by the prosecutors provide sufficient information on the work carried out, the risk involved, the context in the areas where it is produced and the relationships of the people involved in the defamation and persecution strategies against the organization. Only taking into account all of these factors, would the investigation be independent and effective[;] 2) The development of criminal scenarios that involve the work of the Inter-Church Justice and Peace Commission [and] the criminal structures that its work in defending human rights have unveiled[;] 3) the deepening of the investigations carried out in order to unveil the power structures that facilitate, enable and cause the harassment against the Inter-Church Justice and Peace Commission, revealing the intellectual and material perpetrators.” Pursuant to the information provided by Colombia, “in order to protect the life and integrity of the human rights defenders of Justice and Peace and given Danilo Rueda’s working conditions”, the CIJP requested that the National Protection Unit: “1) Implement an immediate attention plan for emergency situations, in [specific places], that takes into account the characteristics of each zone and that is available to immediately and efficiently respond to any security issue[;] 2) Guarantee the mobility of the protection scheme to each place where Danilo Rueda and other members of the [CIJP] travel when carrying out their work as part of [that organization][;] 3) Guarantee the mobility, in secure conditions, of the human rights defenders of the [CIJP] in situations of risk, which implies the mobility of the protection schemes and the rendering of measures of protection in the different regions [;] 4) Implement a mechanism that does not base the functionality of the protection schemes on the existence of gasoline [;] 5) Carry out risk assessments and implementation of measures at the [CIJP] offices in the different regions of the country, including its new headquarters […][,] and 6) Implement security assessments and implementation of prosecutorial measures of protection in Danilo Rueda’s family home […]”. 8 In this regard, according to the State, the National Protection Unit was quoted saying that “we tried to contact Mr. Rueda at the phone number we have registered and through several members of the InterChurch Justice and Peace Commission, who argued that the National Protection Unit was acting beyond its 8