ORDER OF THE
INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS1
OF JUNE 1, 2001
THE CASTILLO PÁEZ, LOAYZA TAMAYO, CASTILLO PETRUZZI ET AL., IVCHER
BRONSTEIN AND CONSTITUTIONAL COURT CASES
COMPLIANCE WITH JUDGMENT

HAVING SEEN:
1.
The decisions of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the
Court” or “the Inter-American Court”) in the judgment on reparations of November
27, 1998, in the Castillo Páez case.
2.
The decisions of the Court in the judgment on reparations of November 27,
1998, in the Loayza Tamayo case.
3.
The decisions of the Court in the judgment of May 30, 1999, in the Castillo
Petruzzi et al. case.
4.
The note of July 16, 1999, received by the Secretariat of the Court on July 27,
1999, in which the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States (OAS)
advised that, on July 9, 1999, the State of Peru (hereinafter “the State” or “Peru”)
had presented an instrument in which it communicated the “withdrawal” of its
declaration consenting to the optional clause concerning recognition of the
contentious jurisdiction of the Court. It also remitted a copy of the original of this
instrument, dated July 8, 1999, in Lima. In this document, the Minister for Foreign
Affairs of Peru indicated that the Congress of the Republic, in Legislative Resolution
No. 27,152 of the same date, had adopted the “withdrawal”, as follows:
[... ] that, pursuant to the American Convention on Human Rights, the
Republic of Peru is withdrawing the declaration consenting to the
optional clause concerning recognition of the contentious jurisdiction of
the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, which the Government of
Peru had made at one time.
The withdrawal of the recognition of the contentious jurisdiction of the
Inter-American Court shall take immediate effect and shall apply to all
cases in which Peru has not answered the application filed with the
Court.

1
Judge Máximo Pacheco Gómez informed the Court that, owing to circumstances beyond his
control, he was unable to attend the Fifty-first Regular Session of the Court; therefore, he did not take
part in the deliberation and signature of this Order.

Select target paragraph3