3 orders of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of June 22 and December 1, 1994 and September 19, 1997. 2. To call upon the State of Guatemala to expand the measures adopted in the instant case in order to ensure the right to life and integrity of Viviana Rucux Quilá. 3. To call upon the State of Guatemala to provide information urgently on the specific measures that are adopted to comply effectively with the provisional measures ordered by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. 4. To call upon the State of Guatemala to continue allowing the petitioners to take part in the planning and execution of the measures and, in general, to keep them informed about the progress of the measures ordered by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. 5. To call upon the State of Guatemala to include information on the investigation and punishment of those responsible for the facts that led to the adoption of the provision measures in its next report and also on the status of the investigations into the alleged threats against Francisca Sales Martín, Natividad Pérez, María García Domingo and Alberto Godínez, Marcos, Juan and Ramiro Godínez Pérez, Alfonso Morales Jiménez and Arturo Federico Méndez Ortiz. 6. To call upon the State of Guatemala to include a detailed description of the measures of protection provided to Patricia Ispanel Medimilla and Fermina López Castro and to Gonzalo Godínez López, Arturo Federico Méndez Ortiz and Juan Mendoza. [...]; General measures: concerning the visits 9. The State’s sixteenth, seventeenth, eighteenth, nineteenth and twentieth reports, of February 2, May 3, July 31, and October 19, 2000, and February 19, 2001, respectively, wherein it reported that some of the homes of the persons on whose behalf provisional measures had been ordered were visited in January, March, June, August and September 2000, and that “no incident that [would have disrupted] their routine, daily activities [had been reported].” In its nineteenth report the State also advised that in those cases where it had been unable to speak directly with the persons for whom provisional measures were ordered, close relatives had said that there had been no incident. In its twenty-first report, dated May 18, 2001, the State reported that the persons being protected would shortly be visited. Nevertheless, no document has been received thus far. Finally, in the seventeenth and eighteenth reports, Guatemala reported that it had “been unable to speak personally with Ramiro, Juan and Marco Godínez Pérez [but] [had] learned that they [had] had no problem to date.” At the March 13, 2001 public hearing, Guatemala stated that “it [had] no objection to continuing to provide the protective measures it [had] provided thus far,” and that it was making its visits in the company of the United Nations Mission for Guatemala (hereinafter “MINUGUA”); 10. The Commission’s March 22 and September 20, 2000 comments on the sixteenth and eighteenth reports, respectively, wherein it asserted that the visits that National Police officers periodically made to the homes of the persons for whom protective measures had been ordered did not in themselves constitute measures of