26 Justice Ministry, the Court has not received any communication from Mr. Castillo Zapata objecting to the compensation that was repaid by Colombia to him and his brothers. The Court understands that the corresponding State authorities have settled the issue raised by Mr. Castillo Zapata. 92. Based on the above considerations, the Court declares that the State has partially complied with operative paragraph thirteen of the Judgment and requests the State, the representatives and the Inter-American Commission to forward to the Tribunal the information necessary to determine whether the amounts deducted as tax were adequately returned. Moreover, the Court requests the State to refer to claims made by the brother of victim Carlos Fernando Castillo Zapata (supra Having Seen 7 and Considering Clause 87) who stated that his mother and father had received smaller amounts than their entitlement for lost income. Moreover, the Court requests the State to forward a copy of Resolutions N° 1468 and N° 2608 of the Interior and Justice Ministry and any other information confirming the settlement and payment of the compensation owed to victims Pablo Antonio Beltrán Palomino, Yul Germán Monroy Ramirez, Gabriel Enrique Vesga Fonseca and Arnulfo Mejia Duarte and her next-of- kin (supra Considering Clause 86 and 88). THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, in exercising its power to monitor compliance with its own decisions, pursuant to Articles 33, 62(1), 62(3), 65, 67 and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, 25(1) and 30 of its Statute and 31 and 69 of its Rules of Procedure,37 DECLARES THAT: 1. The State has fully complied with the obligations to: a) Modify the text and relocate the commemorative plaque that was at the Office of the Prosecutor General (operative paragraph eight and paragraph 277(I)(3) of the Judgment), b) Issue a publication on the facts of La Rochela Massacre (operative paragraph eight and paragraph 277(I)7 of the Judgment), c) Request the Superior Council of the Judicature that the Courthouse of the municipality of San Gil be given a name that evokes the memory of the victims (operative paragraph eight and paragraph 277(I)(8) of the Judgment), d) publish in a widely circulated national newspaper, a “summary of the key elements in the instant case” (operative paragraph eight and paragraph 277(II)(1) of the Judgment), e) Refer the Court’s Judgment to the National Reparations and Reconciliation Commission (operative paragraph eight and paragraph 277(II)(2) of the Judgment); and, 37 2009. Approved by the Court during its LXXXV Ordinary Period of Sessions, held from November 16 to 28,