7 However, in the reports presented after April 2009, the State has not provided further information on the implementation of this measure and the representatives also have not referred to its compliance after their observations of May 22, 2009. The Court considers that it is desirable to request the parties to present up-to-date information on the effective implementation of said diploma course, which shall include a study of the instant case. A scholarship for a specialization in human rights named so as to evoke the memory of the victims 25. In relation to the measure to set up a scholarship for a specialization in human rights at the Escuela Superior de Administración Pública on a permanent basis, if possible, for members of the judiciary (paragraph 277 (I)(6) of the Judgment), the State, in its report of April 14, 2009, explained that said Higher Education School is following administrative procedures to grant the scholarship. 26. The representatives observed that the State has taken some actions to implement this reparation measure, but the measure has not been fulfilled. 27. The Commission noted that “it observe[d] with satisfaction” the information presented by the State on the development of activities to honor the commitments made, as well as the observations of the representatives that confirm the progress made to that end, “and that it [was] waiting for information on the effective and full implementation of all the aspects of the reparation.” 28. The Court acknowledges that, according to the information provided by the parties, the corresponding State institution may have taken steps towards the implementation of this reparation measure. However, in the reports presented after April 2009, the State has not provided further information on the implementation of this measure and also the representatives have not referred to the compliance therewith after the presentation of their observations of May 22, 2009. The Court considers that it is desirable to request the parties to present updated and complete information on the effective establishment of the scholarship, which, according to what was agreed upon, shall be permanent and “be named in such a way that the memory of the victims of the La Rochela Massacre is evoked. The name shall be mutually agreed upon between the State and the representatives.” To publish the facts of La Rochela Massacre 29. As to the obligation by which the Presidential Human Rights Program should issue a publication on the facts of the Rochela Massacre (paragraph 277.I.7 of the Judgment), the State reported that in September 2008, said Presidential Program published the book Voces contra el Olvido, Reconstruccion del caso de la Masacre de La Rochela [Voices Against Forgetting, A Reconstruction of the Case of the La Rochelle Massacre] , the text of which was agreed upon with the victims’ representatives. The state also mentioned that the book has five chapters “which completely reconstruct the facts, the testimonies of the victims’ next-of-kin and it contains a brief introduction into the general aspects of the inter-American System of Human Rights." Moreover, it emphasized that it distributed copies of the book to the representatives in order to pass them on to the next-of-kin and also to public and private entities, including the public libraries of Bogota and Santander, “in order to guarantee its dissemination and society’s