-94order to make society aware of the need for “all Salvadorans […] to work together to find the best solutions […] leading to the truth about the whereabouts of the children,” as the State affirmed in the public hearing before the Court. The State shall comply with this measure within six months of notification of this judgment. h) Medical and psychological care 197. In his affidavit, José Fernando Serrano Cruz, Ernestina and Erlinda’s brother, referred to the physical and psychological problems that his family suffered as a result of the facts of this case, particularly those suffered by his mother. Likewise, the expert witness, Ana Deutsch, stated in her sworn statement that victims and their next of kin require psychological treatment to improve their mental health. The Court considers that a measure must be ordered that will lessen the physical and psychological problems of the next of kin of Ernestina and Erlinda resulting from the circumstances of the violation.67 198. In order to help repair the physical and psychological damage, the Court decides that the State has the obligation to provide, through its specialized health institutions, the free medical and psychological treatment required by the victims’ next of kin, including the medicines they need, in view of the problems suffered by each of them, following individual evaluation. The Court considers it desirable that a specialized non-governmental institution, such as the Asociación Pro-Búsqueda, should be allowed to take part in this evaluation and in the implementation of the treatment. In addition, if Erlinda and Ernestina are found alive, the State must also provide them with the said medical and psychological treatment. 199. Bearing in mind the opinion of the expert witness, Rosa América Laínez Villaherrera, who has evaluated and treated many young people who were found, their next of kin, and families who continue seeking the disappeared (supra para. 35), when providing the said psychological treatment, the specific circumstances and needs of each person must be considered, so that individual, family and collective treatment is offered, as agreed with each of them following an individual evaluation. 200. Within six months, El Salvador must inform the next of kin of Ernestina and Erlinda and Pro-Búsqueda of the names of the health establishments or specialized institutes in which the said medical and psychological treatment will be offered, and provide this treatment. 201. Finally, the Court considers that this judgment constitutes, per se, a form of reparation.68 E) COSTS AND EXPENSES Arguments of the Commission 202. The Commission requested the Court to “order the State of El Salvador to pay 67 Cf. Case of the Plan de Sánchez Massacre. Reparations, supra note 3, para. 106; Case of De la Cruz Flores, supra note 8, para. 168; and Case of the “Juvenile Reeducation Institute”, supra note 9, para. 318. 68 Cf. Case of Lori Berenson Mejía, supra note 3, para. 235; Case of Carpio Nicolle et al., supra note 3, para. 117; and Case of the Plan de Sánchez Massacre. Reparations, supra note 3, para. 81.