18 this other qualitative jump forward in its jurisprudence, - if not it would be in the end consuming precious time on sterile and disaggregating debates, contemplating, - in my concern, and against all lines of its jurisprudential evolution, - the possibility to “separate” Article 8 from 25, in my opinion without even the most minimum convincing judicial basis. I hope that this Court does not stop its avant-garde case-law in the near future to sadly go back, in detriment of the victims of violations to human rights, since this would be deeply regretful for me. The hermeneutics that offer the greatest protection for the human being must be without doubt preserved. Antônio Augusto Cançado Trindade Judge Pablo Saavedra-Alessandri Secretary