494. The State had the opportunity to submit its comments on the outlays made in this case, totaling USD 1,685.36 (one thousand eight hundred eighty-five United States dollars and thirty-five cents). Peru recognized that the itemization of expenditures as presented had been certified by the Court Registrar and therefore was sufficiently reliable. Moreover, these outlays were consistent with the terms of the orders by the President of the Court on August 28, 2012 and December 19, 2013. The State recalled, however, that before ordering a State to reimburse the fund for expenditures incurred, the Court must first verify that the particular case does entail violations of the American Convention, which in the State’s view, had not occurred in the instant case. 495. In view of the violations declared in this judgment, which are consistent with the requirements for using the fund, the Court orders the State to reimburse the fund the amount of USD 1,685.36 (one thousand six hundred eighty-five United States dollars and thirty-five cents) to cover expenditures incurred for an expert witness to appear at the public hearing on the instant case and to formalize and send two affidavits. This amount should be paid within 90 days of the date of notification of this judgment. G. Method of compliance with the payments ordered 496. The State must pay the compensation for costs and expenses as ordered in this judgment directly to the organizations indicated herein, within one year as of the date of notification of this judgment, in the terms given in the following paragraphs. 497. The State must fulfill all its monetary obligations by means of payment in United States dollars or the equivalent in Peruvian currency, calculated according to the exchange rate in effect in the Central Bank of Peru the day prior to the payment. 498. The amounts allocated in this judgment as reimbursement for court costs and attorney fees shall be disbursed in their entirety to the organizations named, as ordered in this judgment, with no deductions for possible fiscal fees. 499. If the State should fall behind in its payments, including for its reimbursement to the Victims Legal Assistance Fund, it must pay interest on the amount owed at the overdue interest rate charged by banks in Peru. XIII OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS 500. Therefore, THE COURT DECIDES, by five votes in favor and one opposed, 1. To deny the preliminary objections lodged by the State, pursuant to paragraphs 37 to 44, 48 to 53, 59 to 69, 75 to 78 and 82 to 83 of this judgment. Dissenting vote, Judge Vio Grossi. DECLARES,