7 OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS 21. Therefore, THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS pursuant to Article 67 of the American Convention on Human Rights and Articles 29(3) and 59 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court DECIDES: By four votes to one, 1. To declare the request for interpretation of the Judgment on preliminary objections, merits, reparations and costs delivered on November 24, 2006 in Case of Dismissed Congressional Employees (Aguado-Alfaro et al.) v. Peru, submitted by Adolfo FernándezSaré, inadmissible on the grounds that it does not conform to Article 67 of the Convention and Articles 29(3) and 59 of the Rules of Procedure, as explained in the considering clauses of this Judgment. Judge Cançado Trindade dissents. 2. To give notice of this Judgment to Adolfo Fernández-Saré, the common interveners for the victims’ representatives, the State and the Commission. Judge Antônio Augusto Cançado Trindade informed the Court of his Dissenting Opinion, which is attached to this Judgment. Done in Spanish and English, the Spanish text being authentic, in San José, Costa Rica, on November 30, 2007. Sergio García-Ramírez President