the General and Air Force Chief of Staff of the War College, [in which] the rights to judicial guarantees and to judicial protection [are studied].” In addition, the State provided information on a course offered in the Center for Advanced Studies of the Army and the Air Force, and in the course of the Joint Chief of Staff of the War College on the analysis of the case law of the inter-American system for the protection of human rights in relation to judicial guarantees and judicial protection, the limits to the military criminal jurisdiction, and the forced disappearance of persons. In this regard, the State indicated that “the Navy Secretariat (SEMAR) imparted courses on the analysis of the case law of the inter-American system to the personnel attached to the different naval commands […] on the limits to the military criminal jurisdiction, and on the rights to judicial guarantees and to judicial protection.” In addition, it indicated that, by February 27, 2013, 165,903 marines had been trained, so that “95% of the operational and non-operational personnel have received training on human rights, and the remaining 5% corresponds to personnel who have recently been incorporated or who have been appointed to other offices.” 34. Lastly, the State forwarded information on the approval of the 2008-2012 National Human Rights Program, in which the President of the Republic ordered the different entities with competence in this area to “incorporate into their preliminary budgets of expenses, resources to ensure compliance with the objectives and goals of [the said program] in the context of the programming of public expenditure and the applicable provisions.” 35. For their part, the representatives stated, in relation to the training of agents of the Public Prosecution Service of the Prosecutor General’s Office, that the courses mentioned by the State had been imparted without consulting the victims or their representatives. In addition, they indicated that the State had not sent them any information about the implementation of other training courses on scientific and specialized investigation techniques for cases of forced disappearance, or information that revealed the State’s intention to implement permanent training programs. Nevertheless, the representatives acknowledged the implementation of training sessions on human rights for officials of the Federation’s Judiciary. However, they indicated that these sessions related to human rights in general or specific topics that had little or no relationship to the limits to the military jurisdiction or to the forced disappearance of persons. Lastly, regarding the training for officials of the Defense Secretariat (SEDENA) and the Navy Secretariat (SEMAR), the representatives acknowledged that these were imparted “structurally and permanently” in these institutions; however, they indicated that it would be desirable to have information on the specific content. In this regard, they considered that “while the Mexican State does not establish these training sessions on disappearances permanently, and using intensive programs outlined by the [Inter-American] Court, it cannot be considered that this operative paragraph of the Judgment has been fulfilled […].” 36. The Commission assessed positively the courses and workshops on human rights imparted in the different State agencies, especially programs focused on “the limits of the military criminal jurisdiction, […] judicial guarantees and judicial protection, and the proper investigation and prosecution of the forced disappearance of persons.” However, it indicated that some of them were not adapted to the topics ordered by the Court in its Judgment. In addition, it indicated that these programs are not offered permanently, so that the obligation on this aspect has not been met. Consequently, the Commission asked the Court to require “the State to provide a detailed plan that describes the way in which [this type of program] has been incorporated, or will be incorporated” permanently into training for State agents, and with the topics established by the Court.                                                                                                                                                                                                  Enfermeras, Escuela Militar de Oficiales de Sanidad, Escuela Militar de Transmisiones and Escuela Militar de Materiales de Guerra.” 13