5 the State “had not complied by awarding the grant for university studies with the conditions laid down by Luis Alberto Cantoral Benavides [...,] and had not suggested any alternative for the joint selection of an academic center where he could carry out his higher education in Peru”; and that Gladys Benavides López was receiving partial healthcare. The representatives requested the Court to convene a “public hearing on monitoring the judgment on reparations,” as a useful mechanism to make progress in complying with the Court’s decisions. 14. The brief of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter “the Commission” or “the Inter-American Commission”) of November 8, 2002, in which it presented information on the status of compliance with the judgment on reparations of December 3, 2001. In this brief, the Commission indicated that the State had not complied with the payment of the pecuniary compensation or with the annulment of the verdict of the Supreme Court of Justice convicting Luis Alberto Cantoral; that it had not awarded the grant for the victim’s university studies; that the State had been complying with the medical and psychological treatment of Gladys Benavides and that it acknowledged as a positive factor that the State had made a public act of redress and published the judgment on merits in the official gazette, but it had not published the operative paragraphs of the judgment in a national newspaper. Lastly, it indicated that the State had not complied fully and within the stipulated time limit with the measures ordered. It therefore requested the Court to order compliance with the obligations imposed as soon as possible, pursuant to Article 68 of the Convention. 15. The brief of the State of November 29, 2002, submitting general information on the status of compliance with the Court’s judgments against Peru. With regard to the judgment on reparations of December 3, 2001, in the instant case, the State advised that by Supreme Resolution No. 021-2002-JUS, the operative paragraphs of the Court’s judgment in the case were published in the official gazette “El Peruano” of February 3, 2002. It indicated that the payments of compensation ordered by the Court were pending, and also the grant for university studies to be awarded to Luis Alberto Cantoral Benavides. It advised that the Office of the Attorney General had initiated the pertinent measures to investigate, prosecute and punish those responsible for the violations of the victim’s human rights. Lastly, it indicated that the Ministry of Health had granted a credential to Gladys Benavides de Cantoral enabling her to receive care in Peruvian health centers and the medicines that were in stock in those centers. 16. The note of the Secretariat of December 13, 2002, on the instructions of the whole Court, requesting the State to submit a detailed report on the status of compliance in this case and granting it until June 16, 2003, to do so. 17. The note of the victim of March 3, 2003, advising that the State had not complied with the decisions in the judgment on reparations delivered by the Court in this case and requesting that the Court intervene before the pertinent Peruvian authorities. 18. The note of the State of April 14, 2003, advising that on March 25, 2003, it had made the payment of US$176,000.00 (one hundred and seventy-six thousand United States dollars) corresponding to the amount of the compensation ordered in this case.