-2- 6. To call upon the State to continue reporting to the American Court of Human Rights, every two months, on its compliance with the measures hereby adopted, and upon the beneficiaries of these same measures, or upon their representatives, to submit their observations to the reports the State is to effect every two months, within four weeks, as from the receipt thereof, and upon the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights to submit its observations to the aforementioned reports by the State, within six weeks, as from the receipt thereof. […] 2. The brief of October 21, 2005 and its Appendixes filed on October 31, 2005, whereby the State, after an extension, granted by the President of the Court (hereinafter “the President”), of the time-limit that had been set, submitted the report on its compliance with the provisional measures, in furtherance of the request in the fourth operative paragraph of the foregoing Order. The State pointed out, inter alia, that: a) The representative of the Ministerio Público (Office of the Public Prosecutors) commenced investigation proceedings and ordered several procedures concerning the attack effected on August 30, 2004 against Mr. Ramírez-Hinostroza However, it was not possible to identify those allegedly responsible, for which reason a more extensive investigation was ordered, including additional procedures, some of which have already been carried out; b) On September 15, 2005 Mr. Ramírez-Hinostroza would have sustained a new attack on his person in the vicinity of his home, which is located in the La Molina District. One of the members of the Judicial Police detailed to his security fired back, and put an end to the shooting; c) On October 4, 2005 the representative of the Ministerio Público (Office of the Public Prosecutors) before the Consejo Nacional de Derechos (National Council for Rights) forwarded Report No. 1 of September 4, 2005, by the Fiscal Provincial Titular de la Cuarta Prosecutoría Provincial Penal de Lima (Prosecutor for the Province in Charge of Lima Provincial Criminal Prosecuting Office Number Four) on the point reached by investigation No. 669-05, wherein she stated that “the result[s] of police investigation are being assessed” and that the División de Homicidios de la Policía Nacional del Perú (Peru National Police Homicides Division) issued Atestado Policial (Police Report) Nº 169, wherein it was concluded that “[…] it has as yet been impossible to identify the authors of the Attempted Homicide with firearms against Luis Alberto Ramírez-Hinostroza and the policeman providing security to him [,] José Luis Salinas Rojas.” Furthermore, the aforementioned Prosecutor reported several steps had been taken, such as affidavits, inspections and reports by expert witnesses, obtention of documents, among other procedures undertaken by the prosecuting office. The aforementioned Prosecutor is assessing the information forwarded her by the División de Homicidios (Homicides Division) regarding the investigation. The aforementioned representative of the Ministerio Público (Office of the Public Prosecutors) did not inform on whether there be any investigation in progress regarding the September 15, 2005 attack. Such information shall be relayed to the Court upon receipt thereof; d) On October 13, 2005 the Ministerio de Justicia (Ministry of Justice) requested the Ministerio del Interior (Ministry of the Interior) and the Secretaría Permanente de la Comisión Nacional de Derechos Humanos