2 3. The submission of February 4, 2009, in which the Republic of Panama (hereinafter “the State” or “Panama”) requested an extended term to send the report on compliance with the Judgment pursuant to the Order of October 30 “as the Ministry of Labor and Labor Development [was] referencing and appendixing the full report […], including signatures and payments after January 30, 2009”. 4. The communication of February 5, 2009, in which the Secretariat of the InterAmerican Court (hereinafter, “the Secretariat”), following orders of the President of the Court, informed the State that it was to submit its report with appendixes no later than February 20, 2009. 5. The submission of March 10, 2009 and its appendixes, through which Panama sent the report drawn up by the Ministry of Labor and Labor Development (hereinafter, the “Ministry of Labor”) concerning the agreements approved; the payment distribution schedules broken down into institutions and workers; and included copies of most of the agreements, of the checks and the ID cards of the victims or successors who received the first of the agreed payments. 6. The note of March 20, 2009, through which the Secretariat, pursuant to instructions of the President of the Court, required the State that it send copies of the bank deposits made to the victims who did not sign the agreements; copies of the agreements and checks made to the two victims who signed the agreements but failed to withdraw their checks, and of the certificates evidencing the withdrawal of checks by other two persons signing the agreements, which documents had not been received by the Court. 7. The submission of March 27, 2009, through which the State requested an extended term to send the documents required by the Inter-American Court. 8. The writing of April 1, 2009 and its appendixes, through which the State submitted part of the information requested, except that concerning the receipts of the bank deposits made to the persons who did not sign the agreement, as the Ministry of Labor and the National Bank were still processing them. Additionally, the State also attached a copy of the checks of some of the persons who had not signed the agreements. 9. The communication of April 3, 2009, through which the Secretariat, following instructions from the President of the Court, required the State to urgently send the documents not yet received by the Court. 10. The writing of April 23, 2009 and its appendixes, through which the State submitted copies of the agreements signed and of the checks extended to the victims which were pending issuance.