correspond to date, and c) any other effect that this decision has or has had. In order to comply with this reparation, the State must adopt all judicial, administrative, or other measures as may be necessary, and has a period of one year as of legal notice of this Judgment to do so. 2. Measures of satisfaction 2.1 Publication and dissemination of the present Judgment 106. The Commission requested the Court to order the State to disseminate the Report on the Merits No. 82/10 in the Judiciary Power. 107. The representatives requested the Court to order the State to publish present Judgment in a newspaper of national scope, in the Official Gazette, on website of the Judicial Information Center of the Supreme Court of Justice of Nation in a visible manner, and if possible, in a permanent manner, as well as in jurisprudential law bulletins distributed in the judiciary. the the the the 108. The Court finds, as it has done in other cases, 76 that the State shall publish, within six months from the date of notification of this Judgment: a) the official summary of this Judgment drafted by the Court, once in the Official Gazette; b) the official summary of this Judgment made by the Court, once in a newspaper of national circulation, and c) the present Judgment in its entirety, available for a period of one year, on the website of the Judicial Information Center of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation. 3. Other measures of reparation requested 3.1. Public apology and acknowledgment of international responsibility 109. The representatives asked the Court to order the State to publically acknowledge its responsibility for the occurrence of the facts to the detriment of the victims and to give a public apology for the human rights violations. With this measure, the goal is to restore the dignity and respect of journalists in relation to the harm they suffered for having been unjustly sentenced and subject to national and international proceedings that lasted approximately fourteen years. 110. The Inter-American Court considers that the issuance of this Judgment, the measure to revoke the decision of the Supreme Court of Argentina in its entirety, as well as the publication of this Ruling in various media streams, private and social means, as well as official ones, are sufficient and appropriate measures of reparation to remedy the violations inflicted on the victims and to fulfill the purpose stated by the representatives. 3.2. Adaptation of the domestic legal system 76 Cf. Case of Barrios Altos V. Perú. Reparations and Costs. Judgment of November 30, 2001. Serie C No. 87, Punto Resolutivo 5.d), and Case of Barbani Duarte et al. V. Uruguay, supra note 8, para. 252. 33