protection and judicial guarantees and if the situation presents issues relative to the judicial independence. The above in light of Articles 8 and 25 in connection with Articles 1.1 and 2 of the American Convention. V. CONCLUSIONS 29. The Commission concludes it is competent to examine the complaints submitted by the petitioner regarding the alleged violation of Articles 8, 9, 13, and 25, consistent with Articles 1.1 and 2 of the Convention and that these complaints are admissible in accordance with the requirements established in Articles 46 and 47 of the American Convention. 30. Based on the factual and legal arguments presented above and without involving a prejudgment on the merits of the case, DECIDES: THE INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, 1. To declare this petition admissible with respect to Articles 8, 9, 13, and 25 of the American Convention, in connection with Article 1.1 and 2 thereof. 2. To transmit this report to the petitioner and to the State. 3. To continue with its analysis of the merits of the case. 4. To publish this report and include it in the Commission’s Annual Report to the General Assembly of the OAS. 6