-107i.
to set aside Municipal Order No. 117 dated July 4, 1997,
whereby it was ordered to continue applying Law No. 26,093, and
continue performing new assessments and dismissals by reason of
redundancy;
ii.
to set aside Municipal Order No. 100 as regards the matter
ordered by judgment of May 8, 2000 on the Record of the Case No.
1922-99;
iii.
to transfer “to the workers, members of the SITRAMUN – Lima,
the premises located at Jr. Lampa No. 170, in the District “Cercado de
Lima,” for the purpose of locating the Union headquarters thereat,
pursuant to judgment dated March 11, 1999, Record of Case No.
2216-98;”
iv.
to set aside Mayoral Resolutions No. 267 and No. 2421 and
Mayoral Decree No. 005-98, which declared the transfer of the land
located at the La Molina District, which would be used to develop a
housing project for the SITRAMUN workers, had elapsed, and which
further declared the cancellation of the corresponding entry in the
register, pursuant to judgment dated August 19, 1999, Case Record
No. 498-99;
v.
to grant any next of kin of the victims suffering from “any kind
of physical or mental health problems, a pecuniary compensation
under the form of health services, so that he/she may fully recover
from illness;”
vi.
to grant the children of the victims that had interrupted their
studies due to the economic situation, “a pecuniary compensation
under the form of education services, through the grant of student
loans and the award of scholarships or grants, so that they may
successfully finish their studies and attain their personal and
professional development;”
vii.
to publicly acknowledge international responsibility for lack of
compliance with the judicial judgments that reaffirmed the
fundamental labor rights of municipal workers;
viii.
to apologize to the victims and their families;
ix.
to publish, in two newspapers of wide circulation within the
country, the express acknowledgment of its responsibility and its
apologies;
x.
to investigate “impartially and apply effective sanctions
―whether administrative, civil or criminal― to the officers of the
Municipalidad Metropolitana de Lima (Metropolitan Municipality of
Lima) who are responsible for the long-lasting failure to comply with
the orders directing the restoration of the labor rights to the workers;”
xi.
to ensure observance of the judicial guarantees and close the
criminal suits referred to in Appendix No. 21 to the brief of requests
and arguments, brought against members of the SITRAMUN–Lima due
to their participation in “events related to the defense of their legal
interests infringed by the Municipality of Lima; “ and
xii.
to adapt the laws on enforcement of labor and social security
judgments to the international obligations of Peru; and
e)
as regards the costs and expenses, the common intervener requested
the Court to order the State the reimbursement of the expenses and costs
arising from the suit, both in the domestic and in the Inter-American
jurisdictions.
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents