-116325. If any of the groups of representatives or CEDAL are not able to receive the reimbursement for costs and expenses within the above mentioned term of one year, due to causes attributable to them, the State shall deposit said amounts in an account in the name of any of them or draw a certificate of deposit from a reputable Peruvian bank in United States Dollars or an equivalent amount in Peruvian currency, under the most favorable financial terms that the law in force and customary banking practice in Peru allow. If after 10 years the compensation be still unclaimed, the amount plus accrued interest shall be returned to the State. 326. The State must, within six months, establish a specific mechanism to give support to the victims in processing the matters referred to in this Judgment and provide them with proficient legal counseling, all at no cost whatsoever,, as provided in paragraph 317 herein. 327. The amounts allocated in this Judgment as compensations and reimbursement of costs and expenses, shall not be affected, reduced or conditioned by taxing conditions now existing or hereafter created. Beneficiaries shall therefore receive the total amount as per the provisions herein. 328. Should the State fall into arrears with its payments, Peruvian banking default interest rate shall be paid on the amount owed. 329. In accordance with its constant practice, the Court retains the authority emanating from its jurisdiction and also deriving from Article 65 of the American Convention, to monitor full compliance with this Judgment. The instant case shall be closed once the State has implemented in full the provisions herein. Peru shall, within fifteen months as from the date notice of this Judgment be served, submit to the Court a report on the measures adopted in compliance therewith. XIII OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS 330. Therefore, THE COURT, DECIDES, Unanimously: 1. To dismiss both preliminary objections raised by the State in the terms of paragraphs 119 to 128 and 132 to 148 herein. 2. To admit the State’s acknowledgment of international responsibility effected before the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights in the terms of paragraphs 169 to 180 herein. DECLARES: Unanimously that: 3. The State violated the right to judicial protection embodied in Articles 25(1) and 25(2)(c) of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to the general