-73Direct Deal Memorandum, […], it is also true that said agreement does not bar termination of the transfer of use insofar, for both legal relationships are independent.”128 204(80) SITRAMUN-Lima filed suit against the Municipality of Lima to enforce compliance with, inter alia, Article 19 of the Direct Deal Memorandum of December 13, 1988 (supra. para 204(77). On March 11, 1999, the Sala Corporativa Transitoria Especializada en Derecho Público (Corporate Provisional Chamber Specializing in Public Law) rendered a decision, allowing the complaint and ordering “the defendant Corporation to comply, in a period not exceeding ten days, with the relevant measures for the headquarters of the Sindicato de Trabajadores Municipales de Lima - SITRAMUN-LIMA (Lima Municipality Workers Union), located at Jirón Lampa No. 170 – Lima - , ground floor and upper stories, be transferred by gift, together with all other provisions contained in Article 19” of the abovementioned Memorandum, on the grounds that the abovementioned Direct Deal Memorandum constitutes an administrative act in force because it has not been annulled and is independent of the decision taken in the eviction proceedings (supra para. 204(79).129 204(81) On June 1, 1999, the Primer Juzgado Corporativo Transitorio Especializado en Derecho Público (First Provisional Corporate Court Specializing in Public Law) rendered a Decision, ordering the Municipality of Lima to comply with the enforceable judgment of March 11, 1999 entered by the Sala Corporativa Transitoria Especializada en Derecho Público (Corporate Provisional Chamber Specializing in Public Law) (supra para. 204(80).130 The Municipality of Lima filed an objection to enforce the judgment of March 11, 1999. On June, 23, 2000, the abovementioned Chamber rejected the objection.131 204(82) On March 10, 2003, the Municipalidad Metropolitana de Lima (Metropolitan Municipality of Lima) and the SITRAMUN-LIMA signed the Final Memorandum of the Employer-Employee Committee Sitramun-Lima, wherein it was stipulated, in Article 11, that “the Municipality of Lima shall continue to transfer the use of the premises located in the Basement of the Municipality Hall to the Sindicato de Trabajadores Municipales de Lima, SITRAMUN, (Lima Municipality Workers Union) to be used as a union office.”132 128 Cf. Judgment rendered by the Supreme Court of Justice of Lima on March 19, 1998 (submission by the Attorney General of the Metropolitan Municipalidad de Lima (Municipality of Lima) on its behalf on August 12, 2005, appendix 5, folio 5349); and judgment rendered by the First Provisional Corporate Court Specializing in Public Law on September 21, 1998 (file of appendixes to the application, appendix 37, folio 1823). 129 Cf. Judgment rendered by the Sala Corporativa Transitoria Especializada de Derecho Público (Corporate Provisional Chamber Specializing in Public Law) on March 11, 1999 (file of appendixes to the application, appendix 37, folio 1827). 130 Cf. Order rendered by the Primer Juzgado Corporativo Transitorio Especializado de Derecho Público (First Provisional Corporate Court Specializing in Public Law) on June 1, 1999 (file of appendixes to the application, appendix 37, folio 1832). 131 Cf. Judgment rendered by the Sala Corporativa Transitoria Especializada de Derecho Público (Corporate Provisional Chamber Specializing in Public Law) on June 23, 2000 (file of appendixes to the application, appendix 37, folio 1833). 132 Cf. Final Memorandum of the Employer-Employee Committee Sitramun – Lima of March 10, 2003 (file of appendixes to the answer to the application, appendix 60, folio 4445).