6 15. That, it should be taken into account that, according to the terms of the Judgment, in order to effectively comply with this obligation, the State must remove all the de facto and de jure obstacles that maintain impunity and use all available means to expedite the investigation and the respective proceedings and thus avoid a repetition of such serious acts as those examined in the instant case (paragraph 165 of the Judgment). In this regard, in the terms of the general obligation to ensure rights established in Article 1(1) of the American Convention, Paraguay should adopt all the necessary diplomatic and judicial measures to prosecute and punish all those responsible for the violations committed, furthering the extradition requests that are admissible under domestic law or the pertinent international law by all possible means (paragraph 166 of the Judgment). Also, to ensure the effectiveness of the collective guarantee mechanisms established in the Convention, and as has been declared, Paraguay and the other States Parties to the Convention should collaborate with each other to eliminate the impunity of the violations committed in this case by the prosecution and punishment of those responsible, and should collaborate with each other in good faith, either through the extradition of those responsible or by prosecuting them on their own territory (paragraph 166 of the Judgment). 16. That, as indicated in paragraph 184 of the Judgment, the State must inform the Court, every six months, about the measures adopted regarding the corresponding investigation and procedures and, particularly about the results, which remains unfulfilled by the State so far. Furthermore, the State must publicly publish said results, so that the Paraguayan society is able to know the truth regarding the facts of the instant case. * * * 17. That as to the obligation of the State to immediately seek and locate Agustín Goiburú Giménez, Carlos José Mancuello, Rodolfo Ramírez Villalba and Benjamín Ramírez Villalba and, if their remains are found, deliver them to their next kin forthwith and cover the costs of their burial (operative paragraph six of the Judgment), the State informed that the representative of the Truth and Justice Commission “proposed to carry out, together with the Inter-Institutional Team and the victims’ next-of-kin, an exchange of necessary information with the intention to assist in the location of victims that is being carried out by the expert witnesses. Furthermore, the State attached a set of official letters issued by different National Police premises that demonstrate the searching tasks and also confirm that the disappeared victims have not been located yet. 18. That the representatives mentioned that “even though it [was] true [that] in the only meeting of the Inter-Institutional Commission, the need to find the human remains was discussed, that was an essential issue of the Judgment. Up to the moment, neither the representatives nor the victims' next- of-kin [have] been called to hold a meeting to exchange information. Though they acknowledge that the [r]epresentative of the Truth Commission proposed this aspect, they consid[er] that it is the State itself, with all its mechanism, [the one] that must search for the remains of the disappeared people [since] the State acknowledged its responsibility for the forced disappearance, it is the State itself who has the factual and legal means to comply with this issue”. Moreover, they noted that the State has the coercive power to require from a large number of people involved in these situations to make public the whereabouts of the victims, specially taking into account that even some of these people are being accused of the same facts. Likewise, they