VI. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 73. The Commission concludes that the State of Argentina is responsible for violating the rights to appeal the judgment and to judicial protection as enshrined in Article 8.2 h) and Article 25.1 of the American Convention in connection with the obligations set forth in Articles 1.1 and 2 thereof, to the detriment of Oscar Raúl Gorigoitia. 74. By virtue of the conclusions above, THE INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS RECOMMENDS THAT THE STATE OF ARGENTINA 1. Order the measures needed for Mr. Gorigoitia, if he wishes, to file an appeal whereby he can obtain a broad review of the judgment of conviction, pursuant to Article 8.2 h) of the American Convention. 2. Provide comprehensive reparations for the violations declared in the present report, including tangible or intangible damages. 3. Order the legislative measures needed to adjust domestic law regarding cassation appeals to the standards set forth in the present report on the right enshrined in Article 8.2 h) of the American Convention. Furthermore, apart from the adjustment of the regulatory framework, ensure that judicial authorities exercise control over the enforcement of conventions when ruling on appeals against judgments of conviction in line with the standards set forth in the present report. 16