75 229. In particular, the State must guarantee, through its competent institutions, that the preliminary investigation which is being conducted into the facts that constituted the rape of Mrs. Fernández Ortega remain within the ordinary jurisdiction. Furthermore, if new criminal actions based on the facts of this case are filed against some of those presumably responsible who are or have been members of the Armed Forces, the authorities in charge of the case must ensure that they are conducted under the ordinary jurisdiction and, in no circumstances, under the military forum.242 230. The Court reiterates that during the investigation and prosecution, the State must ensure the victim full access and capacity to act at all stages. In a case such as this in which the victim, a woman and indigenous person, has had to face various obstacles in order to access justice, the State has the obligation to continue to offer the means by which the victim may fully access and participate in all the proceedings of the case and, to this end, it must ensure that an interpreter is provided, all support with a gender perspective, based on her circumstance of special vulnerability. Lastly, if Mrs. Fernández Ortega offers her consent, the results of the proceedings must be disseminated, so that Mexican society learns the truth about the incident. 231. In addition, on other occasions,243 the Court has ordered the State to initiate disciplinary, administrative or criminal actions under its domestic law with regard to those responsible for the different procedural and investigative irregularities in a case. In the present case, the Court notes that Mexico advised that an administrative investigation had been conducted with regard to the experts who exhausted the samples, and they were sanctioned. For their part, the neither the Commission nor the representatives, whom requested said measure, produced any evidence to the contrary nor did they prove the impossibility of providing it.244 Consequently, the Court does not need to order any measure of reparation in this regard. On the other hand, taking into account that in this case the agent at the Public Prosecutor’s Office caused complications when receiving the complaint filed by Mrs. Fernández Ortega (supra paras. 85 and 195), the Court orders the State to examine this fact and the conduct of the respective official, in keeping with the pertinent disciplinary norms. 232. Finally, in regard to the request to guarantee the security of the victims, the next of kin, and the representatives, the Court recalls that the provisional measures ordered opportunely by this Court remain in force. (supra para. 15). ii) Adaptation of domestic law to the international standards of justice 233. The Commission asked that the Court to order Mexico to limit and restrict the scope of the military jurisdiction, excluding it from hearing cases in which human rights violations have been committed and, particularly, cases of sexual abuse. 234. On its behalf, the representatives asked the Court to order the State to reform Article 13 of the Political Constitution and Article 57 of the Code of Military Justice in order to establish clearly and without any ambiguity that the military system of justice must abstain, whatsoever the circumstances, from hearing cases 242 Cf. Case of Radilla Pacheco, supra note 33, para. 332. 243 Cf. Case of the Dos Erres Massacre, supra note 20, para. 233, subsection d. 244 The Commission only noted that it had not received the relevant information of the State despite it having been requested. (case file on the merits, tome I, folio 26).