93 25 of the American Convention on Human Rights in relation to Article 1(1) of the same instrument, to the detriment of Mrs. Fernández Ortega, pursuant to paragraphs 199 to 201 of the present Judgment. 8. The State is not responsible for the noncompliance with Articles 1, 6, and 8 of the Inter-American Convention to Prevent and Punish Torture to the detriment of Mrs. Fernández Ortega, pursuant to paragraph 202 of this Judgment. 9. It does not befall on the Court to make a declaration on the alleged violation of Article 16 of the American Convention on Human Rights, in the terms of paragraphs 218 and 219 of the present Judgment. AND ORDERS, unanimously, that: 10. This Judgment constitutes per se a form of reparation. 11. The State must effectively conduct in the common jurisdiction, with due diligence and within a reasonable period of time, the criminal investigation, and where needed, the criminal proceedings to determine those criminally responsible and to effectively apply the punishment and consequences that the law dictates, in the period of time established in paragraphs 228 to 230 of this Judgment. 12. The State must, in accordance with the relevant normative principles, examine the facts and conduct of the agent of the Public Prosecutor’s Office that obstructed the reception of the complaint presented by Mrs. Fernandez Ortega, pursuant to paragraph 231 of this Judgment. 13. The State must adopt, in a reasonable period of time, the relevant legislative reforms to conform Article 57 of the Military Code of Justice with international standards on the matter and the American Convention on Human Rights, pursuant to that established in paragraph 239 of this Judgment. 14. The State must adopt the relevant reforms so as to permit that individuals affected by the intervention of the military justice system have an effective remedy to contest its jurisdiction, in conformity with that established in paragraph 240 of this Judgment. 15. The State must carry out a public act of acknowledgment of its international responsibility in regard to the facts of the present case, in the terms of paragraph 244 of the present Judgment. 16. The State must carry out the aforementioned publications, pursuant to that established in paragraph 247 of the present Judgment. 17. The State must provide the medical and psychological treatment as required by the victims, in the terms of paragraphs 251 and 252 of the present Judgment. 18. The State must continue with the process of standardization of an action protocol, for the federal forum and that of the state of Guerrero, regarding the attention provided and investigation of rape, taking into consideration, to the extent relevant, the parameters established in the Istanbul Protocol and the Orders of the World Health Organization, in accordance with paragraph 256 of this Judgment. 19. The State must continue to implement programs and permanent trainings regarding diligent investigation in cases of violence against women, that include an ethnic and gender based perspective, which should be administered to federal employees and those of the state of Guerrero, in conformity with that established in paragraphs 259 and 260 of this Judgment.