TABLE OF CONTENTS
I INTRODUCTION OF THE CASE AND PURPOSE OF THE DISPUTE ................................ 3
1.
THE CASE SUBMITTED TO THE COURT. ................................................................................ 3
2.
PROCEDURE BEFORE THE COMMISSION. .............................................................................. 3
II PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT ......................................................................... 4
III JURISDICTION ....................................................................................................... 5
IV PRELIMINARY OBJECTION ...................................................................................... 5
A. ARGUMENTS OF THE PARTIES AND OF THE COMMISSION ......................................................... 5
B. CONSIDERATIONS OF THE COURT ..................................................................................... 6
V ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY ................................................................. 7
A.
THE STATE’S PARTIAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY AND OBSERVATIONS OF THE
REPRESENTATIVE AND THE COMMISSION ................................................................................. 7
B.
CONSIDERATIONS OF THE COURT.................................................................................. 9
B.1 Regarding the facts .............................................................................................. 9
B.2 Regarding the legal claims ................................................................................... 10
B.3 Regarding the reparations ................................................................................... 10
B.4 Assessment of the acknowledgement of responsibility ............................................. 11
VI EVIDENCE .............................................................................................................. 11
A.
ADMISSION OF THE DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE ................................................................ 11
B.
ADMISSION OF THE ALLEGED VICTIM’S STATEMENT AND EXPERT EVIDENCE ............................ 12
VII FACTS .................................................................................................................. 13
A.
VICENTE ANÍBAL GRIJALVA BUENO ............................................................................ 13
B.
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS OF DISMISSAL OF MR. GRIJALVA BUENO ................................... 14
C.
APPEAL BEFORE THE COURT OF CONSTITUTIONAL GUARANTEES ......................................... 15
D. MILITARY CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST MR. GRIJALVA BUENO .................................... 17
VIII MERITS............................................................................................................... 22
VIII.1 JUDICIAL GUARANTEES ................................................................................... 22
A.
MILITARY CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS ............................................................................. 23
A.1. ARGUMENTS OF THE COMMISSION AND OF THE STATE ....................................................... 23
A.1.1. Right to receive prior and detailed notification of the accusation ........................... 23
A.1.2. Right to examine witnesses.............................................................................. 24
A.1.3. Scope of the presumption of innocence and the duty to state the grounds for a
decision .................................................................................................................. 24
A.1.4.Reasonable time .............................................................................................. 25
A.2 CONSIDERATIONS OF THE COURT ......................................................................................................... 25
A.2.1. Right to receive prior and detailed notification of the accusation ........................... 26
A.2.2. Right to examine witnesses.............................................................................. 28
A.2.3. Scope of the presumption of innocence and the duty to state the grounds for a
decision .................................................................................................................. 29
A.2.4. Reasonable time ............................................................................................. 36
B. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................ 38
VIII.2 RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF THOUGHT AND EXPRESSION ...................................... 38
A.
ARGUMENTS OF THE COMMISSION AND OF THE PARTIES.................................................... 38
B.
CONSIDERATIONS OF THE COURT................................................................................ 39
IX REPARATIONS ....................................................................................................... 42
A.
INJURED PARTY .......................................................... ¡ERROR! MARCADOR NO DEFINIDO.2
B.
MEASURES OF RESTITUTION ...................................................................................... 43
C.
MEASURES OF SATISFACTION..................................................................................... 44
D. OTHER MEASURES ................................................................................................... 45
E.
COMPENSATION ..................................................................................................... 45
E.1. Pecuniary damage ............................................................................................. 46
E.2 Non-pecuniary damage ....................................................................................... 46
F.
COSTS AND EXPENSES ............................................................................................. 47
G. METHOD OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE PAYMENTS ORDERED .................................................. 48
X OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS ....................................................................................... 49

2

Select target paragraph3