50 c) d) to: iii. the Court must equitably determine the compensation for the actual and consequential damage sustained. as regards non pecuniary damage i. the next of kin of Mr. Baldeón-García “have been victims of severe psychological suffering, anguish, uncertainty, sorrow [and] life alterations due to the denial of justice for the death of their loved one;” and ii. the suffering endured by the next of kin of Mr. Baldeón-García, “due to his arrest, physical mistreatment and execution, and the lack of a diligent investigation of the events and an appropriate punishment of the perpetrators, among other grievances, justifies that” the Court “should equitably determine the compensation for the non pecuniary damage sustained.” as regards other types of reparations, the Court must order the State i. “diligently investigate the facts to identify, prosecute and punish the perpetrators of the arrest, cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment, and execution of Bernabé Baldeón-García,” allowing “(t)he victim´s next of kin to have full access and to participate in all stages and instances of said investigation.” The investigations must be concluded within a reasonable time. The Commission considers that the State has accepted the claim; ii. disclose to the public the results of proceedings to allow the Peruvian community to know the truth; iii. publish the judgment of the Court in nation-wide circulation media; iv. name a street, park or school of the Pucapaccana community in the memory of Bernabé Baldeón-García; v. with the approval of the next of kin of the victim, offer a significant and honorable public acknowledgment and apology, in the presence of high-ranking officers; vi. adapt its forensic procedures to comply with internationally accepted standards and best practices; vii. adopt as a priority a policy to protect peasants from abuses by public authorities and state security forces, while decentralizing –as a matter of public policy– the fight against impunity; viii. promote the conditions necessary for Mrs. Guadalupe YllaconzaRamírez to be able to return to Puccapaccana, at her discretion; and ix. offer rehabilitation measures to the next of kin of Mr. BaldeónGarcía, which must include psychological, occupational and medical rehabilitation. e) as regards costs and expenses, the Commission stated that the Court should order the State to pay the costs and expenses actually incurred taking into account the nature of the instant case. Argument of the representatives 171. As regards reparations, the representatives stated that: a) the beneficiaries of the reparations are Guadalupe Yllaconza-Ramírez de Baldeón (wife of the victim); Crispín, Fidela, Roberto, Segundina, Miguelita, Perseveranda, Vicente and Sabina, all of them members of the