6 i) The obligation of the State to pay the total amount ordered by the Court as costs and expenses (operative paragraph no. 14); j) The obligation to pay interest on any amount owed (operative paragraph no. 17). AND IT DECIDE[D]: 1. To require the State to take the necessary measures to fully and immediately comply with the unfulfilled operative paragraphs of the Judgment of preliminary objections, merits and reparations delivered by the Court on June 7, 2003 and this Order, according to the provisions of Article 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights. 2. To require the State to submit to the Court, before January 30, 2006, a detailed report on the actions taken in order to comply with the reparations ordered by the Court which are still pending, as set forth in Considering clauses No. 9 to 13 and declaratory paragraph two in the instant Order. 3. To request the representatives of the victim’s next of kin and the InterAmerican Commission on Human Rights to file comments on the report of the State within four and six weeks, respectively, as from the date of receipt of the report. 4. To continue monitoring compliance with the unfulfilled paragraphs of the Judgment of preliminary objections, merits and reparations of June 7, 2003. 7. The brief of January 25, 2006, whereby the representatives of the victim’s next of kin (hereinafter "the representatives”) requested the Court to require the State of Honduras (hereinafter “the State” or “Honduras”) “to take urgent protective provisional measures, pursuant to the provisions of Article 63(2) of the American Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” or “the American Convention”) and Article 25 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court, in favor of the next of kin of Juan Humberto Sánchez, […] to secure the right to humane treatment enshrined in Article 5 of the Convention.” 8. The representatives founded the request for provisional measures as follows: That, according to operative paragraph number eleven of the Judgment of preliminary objections, merits and reparations of June 7, 2003, the remains of Juan Humberto Sánchez were exhumed on August 24, 2004. However, the remains have not been delivered to his next of kin; on the contrary, the State acted as custodian of the remains and transferred them to the facilities of Medicina Forense (Forensic Medicine), alleging that certain DNA testing must be carried out and, to date, the remains have not been delivered to the victim’s next of kin and there is no sufficient evidence as to when the remains will be delivered. 9. The representatives presented, among others, the following arguments in support of the request for provisional measures: a) The failure by the State to deliver the mortal remains of the victim to his mother and other next of kin “makes them suffer severe psychological damage and emotional distress because they do not know where the remains are, how the remains are being handled, if they are in a safe place and, above all, when the remains will be delivered to them. For this situation, the victim’s next of kin are suffering deep humiliation and great pain.” This particularly affects the victim’s mother, Mrs. María Dominga Sánchez, who is suffering from great depression for not “having” her son and being unable to bury him;